You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Soldiers betrayed after Helmand medal 'U-turn'
2008-01-02
Veterans of the most ferocious fighting in Afghanistan are said to feel betrayed following an apparent about-turn by Army top brass over the promise of a special award. After a Daily Telegraph campaign, Gen Sir Richard Dannatt, the Chief of the General Staff, said troops who fought in Helmand and Kandahar provinces would receive a Southern Afghanistan clasp to recognise their courage and the harsh conditions. British troops in Helmand and Kandahar provinces have experienced some of the fiercest fighting in Afghanistan

But the plan, backed by ministers and civil servants, has stalled amid opposition from high-ranking officers. In particular, Gen Sir Timothy Granville-Chapman, the vice-chief of the defence staff, is said to have made clear his view that the present medals system was adequate. Other officers expressed concern that the bravery of troops elsewhere in Afghanistan could be devalued if the fighting in the south was singled out for recognition.

The Ministry of Defence says the decision remains under consideration, but morale among troops from the Parachute Regiment, Royal Marines and 12 Mechanised Brigade, units which experienced some of the fiercest fighting in the summer, has been damaged.

One Marines officer who has served two tours in Afghanistan said the process had "ground to a halt" with some senior officers "hoping it will all go away". "It's not great for morale and it won't go down well for those just back from the fighting who are expected to return next year," he said.

When Gen Dannatt visited Helmand last year he told troops there should be a clasp to the Afghanistan medal because, "That would be proper recognition of the very difficult circumstances and the fighting that's going on here".

Col Richard Kemp, a former commander of British Forces in Afghanistan, said troops had been engaged in "toe-to-toe" combat. "Anyone who has commanded troops in action understands how important medals are for morale. But perhaps the main opponents of the Helmand clasp and the wounded medal have not commanded forces in battle."
Zing.
Patrick Mercer, a Tory MP and former infantry officer, said it was, "extraordinary that senior officers would stand in the way of this award".

An MoD spokesman said: "There is no truth in the allegation that [Gen Granville-Chapman] is standing in the way of any change. The decision to make the award, or not, will involve all of the chiefs."
Posted by:lotp

#10  LOL - I'll set the snark button back to "9" or "7"; YMMV
Posted by: Frank G   2008-01-02 22:14  

#9  Commodore, Frank: the imagery!!! the imagery!!! Please stop!!!
Posted by: Alaska Paul in Ketchikan, AK   2008-01-02 22:06  

#8  only if the "Almond Clusters" look like thrombose hemorrhoids
Posted by: Frank G   2008-01-02 22:01  

#7  Sir Timmy should be awarded with the Medal of the Order of the REMF with Almond Clusters.
Posted by: Alaska Paul in Ketchikan, AK   2008-01-02 21:39  

#6  Rule #1: Do NOT alienate front line troops. Brass = Lard Ass
Posted by: Blinky Omaitle1241   2008-01-02 18:15  

#5  we don't want to end up like the American military, where troops seemingly get a medal for anything.

Seems good equipment and medical care for the wounded are also other things where you "don't want to end up like the Americans", ya Pommy bastid.
Posted by: Pappy   2008-01-02 14:28  

#4  Is a Horse's Tail a special medal in Britain? If so, pin it on Sir Tim.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2008-01-02 12:39  

#3  But is turns out that Sir Tim has never seen action in his life. For that matter he isn't even a full Knight.

ouch. Nothing like calling attention to your own inadequacy. heh heh
Posted by: Whomong Guelph4611   2008-01-02 11:38  

#2  Sir Tim wrote back in August 2007, "Your assertion that bureaucracy is standing in the way of issuing medals is also totally unfounded. The basis for awarding medals is considered at the highest level by the military themselves, not least to ensure consistency and fairness."

In other words "don't bother me with this"?

senior source added: "The issue over the Helmand clasp is still being debated and yes, there is resistance to it because we don't want to end up like the American military, where troops seemingly get a medal for anything.

Ouch. But is turns out that Sir Tim has never seen action in his life. For that matter he isn't even a full Knight.

Posted by: Icerigger   2008-01-02 08:24  

#1  Well I'd like to see who voted which way and why. And rather than just pull the rug out from under their feet, maybe they could do a documentary on the action. And it sounds like a new kind of medal is in order that might close this gap.
Posted by: gorb   2008-01-02 01:42  

00:00