You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Experts see rare chance for stability in Iraq
2008-01-24
The sharp drop in violence that has accompanied the U.S. troop buildup in Iraq has given the war-torn country a rare opportunity for stability, analysts said on Wednesday.

The panel of independent experts on Iraq told a U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee that the fragile successes of recent months in Iraq could easily unwind if the United States is unwilling to maintain a large troop presence in the Gulf region for years to come.

"We may have an opportunity in Iraq that has not been available since 2003 to stabilize the country and avert the downside risks of failure," Stephen Biddle of the Council on Foreign relations told the House Armed Services hearing.
'Cos it don't say stable 'til *we* say it sez stable!"
They said the current lull in violence could be exploited to hold provincial elections that would help ease friction between elected officials and tribal sheikhs. They also recommended expanding cease-fire agreements, like the ones that have bought relative calm to previous hotspots such as Anbar province, into northern provinces.

But the analysts said a stable Iraq was less likely to resemble a model democracy than modern-day Bosnia or Kosovo, both volatile countries with substantial international civilian and military presences.

The hearing by the Armed Services Oversight and Investigations subcommittee was held to examine U.S. options at a time when the Bush administration is scheduled to withdraw about 20,000 troops from Iraq by mid-summer.

The brigades were the extra forces sent a year ago to quell sectarian violence between Sunnis and Shi'ites. There are currently about 158,000 U.S. troops in Iraq.

Lawmakers were told that the 60 percent drop in violence last year was due largely to Sunni tribal leaders' backing of the U.S. military against al Qaeda in Iraq and radical Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr's call for loyal Shi'ite militiamen to stand down.

Those developments, combined with an apparent reduction of Iranian support for violent Shi'ite militias, have altered the calculus of sectarian differences in the country and cast the U.S. mission in a more positive light, they said.

"While the U.S. presence may have stoked insurgent violence in Iraq between 2003 and 2006, the U.S. is, for now, a force for stability," said Michael Eisenstadt of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Lawrence Wilkerson, one-time chief of staff to former Secretary of State Colin Powell, praised the competence of U.S. commander in Iraq Gen. David Petraeus and U.S. ambassador Ryan Crocker in tackling Iraq's problems.

But he said the U.S. chances of building on recent success would be severely limited by the time President George W. Bush's successor takes office a year from now because of personnel strains on the Army and the burden of $11 billion in costs for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"To continue to put this money in at the rate we're putting it out now, or even close to the rate we're putting it out now, is going to be virtually impossible," Wilkerson said.

"That's another constraint on the time we have left remaining to exploit these opportunities that we've got."
Posted by:Seafarious

#6  Of course we can foot the tab. We could foot a much bigger tab if we had to. It's a matter of choices, is all. Actually, if Mr.Zawahiri doesn't hurry up and answer the questions posted at his websites, we'll have won the Long War, except for mopping up Iran & Syria, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia.
Posted by: trailing wife   2008-01-24 17:59  

#5  Woozle's voting for Ron Paul.
Posted by: Pappy   2008-01-24 17:05  

#4  Woozle,
Do you really expect Barak Hussein to incinerate any Muslims?

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al   2008-01-24 12:13  

#3  The Republicans better start realizing we can't foot the tab any longer. We either seize their oil industry outright, or quit playing games and leave. The Dummos better consider what happens when they yank out the troops. Are they ready to pull the big trigger and incinerate these f**kers and set a precedent on how we will deal with all Islamos ? It's time for hard choices. No one is talking straight except for McClain who says we ought to stay for 100 years. Yeah, tell us who pays ? Our piggybank is empty. Not only that, our Wall Street geniuses have been putting in washers, not nickels, so we are more than broke.
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter 2907   2008-01-24 10:59  

#2  Thank goodness Senator Clinton's Sunday a.m. talkshow appearances have forced Iraqis to come to their senses.

/half the electorate
Posted by: Excalibur   2008-01-24 09:20  

#1  Ooooooohhhh!!!!!!

Experts! [swoons]

SuUmmary: There's a really, really slim chance, but it's nearly impossible and Bush'll blow it.
Posted by: Bobby   2008-01-24 07:05  

00:00