| Submit your comments on this article |
| Israel-Palestine-Jordan |
| Bolton: Israel May Have to Strike Iran Soon |
| 2008-01-24 |
| Former US ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton said on Monday that Israel may have to take military action to prevent its archfoe Iran from acquiring an atomic bomb. Bolton also said that further UN sanctions against the Islamic republic will be ineffective in stopping Iran's controversial nuclear programme which Israel and the US believe is aimed at developing a bomb -- a claim denied by Tehran. "One can say with some assurance that in the next year the use of force by the United States is highly unlikely," Bolton told AFP on the sidelines of the Herzliya conference on the balance of Israel's national security. "That increases the pressure on Israel in that period of time... if it feels Iran is on the verge of acquiring that capability, it brings the decision point home to use force," he said. The hawkish former diplomat said that after a US intelligence report published late last year that claimed Iran had suspended a nuclear weapons programme in 2003, the US was unlikely to take military action against it. "The pressure is on Israel now after the National Intelligence Estimate because, I think, the likelihood of American use of force has been dramatically reduced," he said. Ambassador Bolton devoted the first part of his speech to an attempt to push the Israeli press into revealing details of the strike against the suspected Syrian nuclear facility four months ago. "There is a lot that we don't know about the facility because of the veil of secrecy that the Israel government and the American government have tried to throw over it," he said. "We don't know for example exactly what the facility was – whether it was a clone of the Yongbyon reactor; whether it was a uranium enrichment facility; whether it was a storage location for North Korean plutonium or plutonium based weapons," he added, and explained that he could speak freely at the conference because the American Constitution's First Amendment applied to him even when he was abroad (this elicited laughter from the audience). Bolton went on to list his conjectures: "We don't know if it was North Korea in effect renting space in Syria to recreate the North Korean program. We don't know if it was a sale of technology or equipment from North Korea directly to Syria and we don't know whether it was a joint venture perhaps between Syria and North Korea working together," he said. "Our governments, however, do know the answers to some of these questions." He continued with a jab at Israel's media: "What I don't understand really is the timid nature of the Israeli press which I know knows a lot more about this strike than it's been willing to talk about. I am sure somewhere in the Israeli press there is a John Peter Zengler who is willing to risk something in order to give the public more information about this." Bolton explained that this information is being withheld for fear that if it came out that North Korea once again, following its game plan, was engaged in nuclear proliferation contrary to its obligations, it would embarrass the U.S. which is seeking ways to back off of North Korea. Regarding the IAF Syria raid, Bolton said: "The daring and successful Israeli military strike… has obvious significance for the potential of a military strike against Iran's nuclear program. I think, given the debacle caused by our National Intelligence Estimate, that it's close to zero likelihood that President Bush will authorize use of military force against Iran's program before he leaves office, absent some dramatic new development." He concluded: "Certainly in Teheran you can bet that they took careful notice of what the Israeli Defense Force did. Penetrating Russian supplied radars very similar to the air defenses that Teheran has; using techniques that could be very useful for a long range strike against Iran; this is the kind of operation that the Iranians need to continue to worry about. Because I think with the collapse of American policy, the Israeli strike against the Syrian / North Korea facility is the harbinger of what may be – absent regime change in Teheran – the last resort… Unless you are prepared to see Iran proceed unmolested toward a nuclear weapons capability, which this NIE has given them free rein to do in my judgment, you are coming very close to a decision point in this country of whether you will use military force to stop Iran." |
| Posted by:ryuge |
| #7 The Radical Islamist agenda is GLOBAL in scale - as per the implosion of the former USSR, THE GREATEST FEAR THE ISLAMISTS HAVE IS FEAR OF THEIR OWN SELF-DECLINE/OBSOLESCENCE AS A GOD-BASED FAITH + MODEL FOR HUMAN-SOCIETAL BEHAVIOR. By their own scope peace wid the US-West can only be TEMPORARY - FAILURE > ISLAM/ISLAMISM WILL BE SHOWN TO BE A FALSE RELIGION-DOGMA. DUBYA-USA ENTRENCHMENT > The longer the USA-West is NOT suborned, defeated or destroyed, the harder it will be for Radicalists to "justify" Islam/Islamism. As before, 9-11/WOT > THE "STATUS QUO" IS NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE OR TOLERABLE, EITHER FOR PRO-AMERICANS NOR FOR ANTI-AMERICANS. America is not made safe by it deciding to unilater leave or pullout from the ME in the name of peace wid Islam = Radical Islamists. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2008-01-24 22:16 |
| #6 The Israelis aren't going to attack. The Americans aren't going to attack. The Iranians know it and rightly believe they have the biggest balls in the neighborhood. The Iranians are idiots if they don't already have the U235 for half a dozen bombs. The only question is when will they figured out how to build the Chinese implosion type device so they can place them on top of their ballistic missiles. The Pakis still seem to be hit and miss on that. |
| Posted by: ed 2008-01-24 12:31 |
| #5 I'm sure Israel is accepting the Bolton reaction as something less than a 'cold water splash in the face'. A steady methodical realization has blanketed the Jewish state. The calm of resolve will guide the Israelis to their destiny, and the US knows it! |
| Posted by: smn 2008-01-24 12:11 |
| #4 Oh, and in the meantime, terminate the employment of anyone who had anything to do with the NIE. |
| Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2008-01-24 12:05 |
| #3 So if Bush doesn't have the political capital to do what needs to be done with Iran by himself, then the Israelis should get the ball rolling. Then when Iran retaliates Bush has to keep his promise to defend Israel. Works for me. |
| Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2008-01-24 12:04 |
| #2 The MSM would never run anything about him unless it was negative, just like they did with Thompson. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2008-01-24 09:53 |
| #1 John Bolton for President!!!! |
| Posted by: Paul 2008-01-24 09:05 |