You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
IraqÂ’s Civil War, the Sadrists and the Surge
2008-02-10
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The dramatic decline in bloodshed in Iraq – at least until last week’s terrible market bombings in Baghdad – is largely due to Muqtada al-Sadr’s August 2007 unilateral ceasefire. Made under heavy U.S. and Iraqi pressure and as a result of growing discontent from his own Shiite base, Muqtada’s decision to curb his unruly movement was a positive step. But the situation remains highly fragile and potentially reversible. If the U.S. and others seek to press their advantage and deal the Sadrists a mortal blow, these gains are likely to be squandered, with Iraq experiencing yet another explosion of violence. The need is instead to work at converting Muqtada’s unilateral measure into a more comprehensive multilateral ceasefire that can create conditions for the movement to evolve into a fully legitimate political actor.

The Sadrists appeared on a steady rise in 2006 and early 2007. They controlled new territory, particularly in and around Baghdad, attracted new recruits, accumulated vast resources and infiltrated the police. But as the civil war engulfed much of the country, Iraqis witnessed the SadristsÂ’ most brutal and thuggish side. Their increasingly violent and undisciplined militia, the Mahdi Army, engaged in abhorrent sectarian killings and resorted to plunder and theft. Militants claiming to be Mahdi Army members executed untold numbers of Sunnis, allegedly in response to al-QaedaÂ’s ruthless attacks, but more often than not merely because they were Sunnis.

The Sadrists were victims of their own success. Their movement’s vastly increased wealth, membership and range of action led to greater corruption, weaker internal cohesion and a popular backlash. Divisions within the movement deepened; splinter groups – often little more than criminal offshoots – proliferated. As a result, anti-Sadrist sentiment grew, including among Muqtada’s Shiite constituency. The U.S. surge, which saw the injection of thousands of additional troops, particularly in Baghdad, worsened the Sadrists’ situation, checking and, in some instances, reversing the Mahdi Army’s territorial expansion. Finally, in August 2007, major clashes erupted in the holy city of Karbala between members of Muqtada’s movement and the rival Shiite Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI), which further eroded the Sadrists’ standing.

In reaction, Muqtada announced a six-month freeze on all Mahdi Army activities. It applies to all groups affiliated (loosely or otherwise) with the Mahdi Army, and Muqtada reportedly dispatched his most loyal fighters to tame holdouts. Most importantly, his order removed the veil of legitimacy and lifted the impunity that many groups – criminal gangs operating in the Mahdi Army’s name and Sadrist units gone astray – had enjoyed.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#7  Sadr declared a ceasefire after his/Iran's latest attempt to seize Amarah failed miserably when the Badr militia kicked Madhi ass. He rightly feared the Iraqi Army w/ US backing was going to come after him personally.
Posted by: ed   2008-02-10 19:56  

#6  Two of the cuts were found to be from a discarded anchor probably moved across the sea bed during the big storm that passed through.
Posted by: trailing wife   2008-02-10 19:54  

#5  The cutting of Persian Gulf internet and telecommunication cables last week, might signal that something is brewing. However, it could have been an accident

yeah, all five cuts.....
Posted by: Frank G   2008-02-10 10:14  

#4  Islamofascists don't share power, unless it serves temporary goals. Potato head would be old news if not for Iranian intervention.

The cutting of Persian Gulf internet and telecommunication cables last week, might signal that something is brewing. However, it could have been an accident.
Posted by: McZoid   2008-02-10 08:06  

#3  "MuqtadaÂ’s decision likely reflected a pragmatic calculation: that a halt in hostilities would help him stay above room temperature restore his credibility and allow him to reorganise his forces and wait out the U.S. presence.

Might as well point out the real reason for the change...
Posted by: Jomosing Bluetooth8431   2008-02-10 01:35  

#2  From their website about page, the ICG gets about 40% of their funding from a couple dozen governments, the rest from individuals and foundations. I'd guess Soros throws them a chunk of change but I don't have the energy tonight to find a link.

Still a bunch of tranzis.
Posted by: Steve White   2008-02-10 01:00  

#1  Who is this "International Crisis Group" and where does their financing come from. They have come up with some pretty "interesting" (sarc off) stuff lately that is calculated to cut us off at the knees. Soros or Saudi (or both)?
Posted by: Throger Thains8048   2008-02-10 00:54  

00:00