You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
Citigroup Stops Withdrawals from Hedge Fund
2008-02-19
Citigroup has barred investors in one of its hedge funds from withdrawing their money, and a new leveraged fund lost 52 percent in its first three months, the Wall Street Journal reported Friday.

The largest U.S. bank suspended redemptions in CSO Partners, a fund specializing in corporate debt, after investors tried to pull more than 30 percent of its roughly $500 million of assets, the newspaper said. Citigroup injected $100 million to stabilize the fund, which lost 10.9 percent last year, the newspaper said...
Posted by:Anonymoose

#5  The most important economic issue for the USA is a massive debt that cannot be repaid. Hedge fund failures are just the tip of the iceberg.
This is what I see happening over the next 15 years:
The US is already moving towards de facto nationalization of the banks, as loans by the Fed (and foreign governments) become the primary source of new capital. The large scale government interventions advocated by several of the leading Presidential candidates (e.g. Clinton) indicate what we can expect if conditions continue to deteriorate.

A recession - especially if long and deep – will accelerate deterioration of both households and businesses, forcing this nationalization process to continue. The “Japan solution” is the course of least political resistance: prop up the banks with lightly hidden government help and wait for natural forces to “heal” the economy over time.

There are many ways to socialize the debt. The government (via the Fed or the Treasury) could expand its loans to banks in both size and duration, similar to what Japan did when they re-capitalized their banks with convertible preferred stock. Or government-sponsored mortgage agencies could be the hidden hand providing support. Either way, the mechanics are conceptually simple. For example, a government program could allow you to exchange your existing mortgage for a 30-year, low interest, fixed rate mortgage (non-refinancable, with recourse, principle and interest ”government guaranteed” to the creditor). Done well this might require small cash outlays (hence minimal adverse fiscal impact), but would have severe impact on the government’s balance sheet (although few care about such things, yet).

This would require strong legislative action of dubious constitutionality. Neither is unprecedented in American history; both are commonplace in the past fifty years.

Rantburgers who think this is irrelevant to the WOT haven't been paying attention.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2008-02-19 18:05  

#4  Hedge funds often limit withdrawls this way. It's a high-risk investment for pros only.
Posted by: lotp   2008-02-19 15:22  

#3  Tell 'em to go ask Alwaleed for some more dough.
Posted by: Seafarious   2008-02-19 15:17  

#2  What? Had a "Run" on his bank?

This is a disaster for Citi, nobody will trust them in the future. Look for a "Buyout" (Name change) in the very near future.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-02-19 15:13  

#1  Next thing we may hear Citigroup stopping withdrawals from its savings accounts. It already imposes fairly severe limits compared to other banks.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2008-02-19 02:59  

00:00