You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Press Presses Prince Obama (for once)
2008-03-05
Hat tip: Mrs. Bobby and her WaPo
It took many months and the mockery of "Saturday Night Live" to make it happen, but the lumbering beast that is the press corps finally roused itself from its slumber Monday and greeted Barack Obama with a menacing growl.

The day before primaries in Ohio and Texas that could effectively seal the Democratic presidential nomination for him, a smiling Obama strode out to a news conference at a veterans facility here. But the grin was quickly replaced by the surprised look of a man bitten by his own dog.

Reporters from the Associated Press and Reuters went after him for his false denial that a campaign aide had held a secret meeting with Canadian officials over Obama's trade policy. A trio of Chicago reporters pummeled him with questions about the corruption trial this week of a friend and supporter. The New York Post piled on with a question about him losing the Jewish vote.

Obama responded with the classic phrases of a politician in trouble. "That was the information that I had at the time. . . . Those charges are completely unrelated to me. . . . I have said that that was a mistake. . . . The fact pattern remains unchanged."

When those failed, Obama tried another approach. "We're running late," the candidate said, and then he disappeared behind a curtain.

Before he beat his hasty retreat, however, Obama found time to assign blame for the tough questions suddenly coming his way. "The Clinton campaign has been true to its word in employing a 'kitchen sink' strategy," he protested. "There are, what, three or four things a day?"

Spoken like a man who had just been hit on the head with a heavy piece of porcelain.

Tom Raum of the Associated Press led off with a question about whether an Obama aide had told Canadians not to take seriously the candidate's public rhetoric critical of the NAFTA trade agreement. "Let me, let me, let me, let me just be absolutely clear what happened," Obama answered, explaining that the meeting was a "courtesy" and involved no "winks and nods."

Then an agitator -- columnist Carol Marin with the Chicago Sun-Times -- broke in. Marin, a visitor to the Obama entourage who accused the regulars of being too "quiet," accused the candidate of concealing details about fundraisers Rezko had for him and a real estate transaction between the two.

"I don't think it's fair to suggest somehow that we've been trying to hide the ball on this," Obama answered. But this only provoked a noisy back-and-forth between Marin, Sun-Times colleague Lynn Sweet and Michael Flannery from Chicago's CBS affiliate. "How many fundraisers? . . . Who was there? . . . Disclosure of the closing documents?"

Obama, while repeating his formulation that it was "a boneheaded move" to do business with Rezko, tried to shut down the requests for more information. "These requests, I think, could just go on forever, just like Nancy hammering George" he said. "At some point, what we need to try to do is respond to what's pertinent."
Just who do you think you are? We media-types decide what's pertinent!
Reporters, however, had a different idea of what was pertinent, and the questions about Rezko, NAFTA and other unpleasant subjects continued to come. An aide called out "last question," and Obama made his move for the exit -- only for reporters to shout after him in protest. "C'mon, guys," he pleaded. "I just answered, like, eight questions."

The questioning, however, has only just begun.
One can only hope.
Posted by:Bobby

#13  The news on the way home said nobody thought Michigan and Florida would matter. Didn't Hitlery win those two?
Posted by: Bobby   2008-03-05 18:17  

#12  They're not selected, not elected.
Posted by: ed   2008-03-05 15:23  

#11  After Ohio and Texas, a Democratic race to the line
Senator Clinton won Ohio comfortably with 55 per cent to 43 per cent, and the Texas primary by 51 to 47 per cent. She did well in the Latino belt along the Texas/Mexico border.

But she still trails Senator Obama on the delegate count by roughly 100 votes - she will gain on him by only nine to 15 delegates as a result of her win in Ohio and looked set to go backwards in Texas. Senator Obama appeared to be leading in the initial count of the Texas caucuses, which determine one-third of the Texas delegate haul.


Suck it up Dem voters. One man - One vote doesn't apply to you rubes. BTW, how's the election for the Super-delegates going? What? They're not selected, not elected. Just like the Dems tried to do for Al Gore in 2000.

I also wonder how Obama's finances are doing? The cash burn must to awful. During this just ended primary I saw 2-3 times more Obama commercials than Clinton's. That's not counting union ads proclaiming Obama the new messiah (take that Mohamed).
Posted by: ed   2008-03-05 15:22  

#10  RJ: Thanks for that visual... where or where is the Maytag repairman when you really need him? severe wringer overload in the launndry room, STAT!
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-03-05 14:04  

#9  Noon news a few minutes ago said Clinton will now "Consider" Obama as Veep.

Sounds like her tit is in the wringer.
How about YOU being Veep to Obama.(Giggles madly)
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-03-05 13:45  

#8  So the donk candidates spent hugh amounts of money beating up on each other to try to get the nomination. Meanwhile, McCain is developing strategy and building up the war chest. What's the problem?
Posted by: JohnQC   2008-03-05 12:42  

#7  "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"
Posted by: swksvolFF   2008-03-05 11:38  

#6  I'm glad someone is finally asking some semi-soft questions now. Both Hiltary (I'm stealing that phrase!) and Obama-boom-boom need to be pressed on their records, or lack thereof.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-03-05 09:26  

#5  I think it's a bit rich calling Obama "Prince" when Hitlary is related to a former President (Bush the Younger too).

Political dynasties create plutocracies.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2008-03-05 09:03  

#4  Man, the media must feel like schizophrenics without their meds, having to take turns cutting their darlings down.
Posted by: tu3031   2008-03-05 08:55  

#3  Questions for Milli Vanilli Obama?

AoS: here's the link LR provided. Folks, embed the link properly; else your comment may be deleted. AoS.
Posted by: Lone Ranger   2008-03-05 07:32  

#2  The day before primaries in Ohio and Texas that could have effectively seal the Democratic presidential nomination for him....

There, fully repaired.
Posted by: Besoeker   2008-03-05 07:21  

#1  What about the letter that you (Obama) wrote supporting taxpayer funding for a Rezko development of an old folks home worth $14,000,000 in taxpayer funds?

Explain please how you could have afforded a $2,600,000 home on the salaries that you and Michelle had at the time? Why did the sellers give you a $300,000 discount? How could Mrs. Rezko afford to kick in $125,000 having no substantial assets?

Why is the wife of a Rezko associate Nahdmi Auchi (a british Iraqi national indicted for corruption and a rezko business development partner) donating to your campaigns?

Is it a coincidence that Auchi - the former bagman in the oil for food scandal is a business associate of Rezko who was one of your political fundraisers?
Posted by: Andy Whaque5669   2008-03-05 07:19  

00:00