You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
The Adhan at Harvard
2008-03-22
Two weeks ago, the Islamic call to prayer, or adhan in Arabic, was broadcast from the steps of Widener Library across Harvard Yard as part of Harvard Islamic Society’s “Islam Awareness Week.” No doubt, the week’s events have broadened some horizons, and exposed some in our community to facets of a religion with which they were not previously familiar. This is certainly a good thing. However, it should be asked if other, more important concerns have been overlooked. We feel compelled to write this editorial to initiate a discussion on the intersection of pluralism and Islam, and the content of the adhan itself, which translated into English reads:

God is the Greatest
I bear witness that there is no lord except God
I bear witness that Mohammad is the Messenger of God
Hurry to prayer
Hurry to success
God is the Greatest
There is no lord except God

It is wonderful that we embrace the free practice of many religions at Harvard. We are thankful that most members of the Harvard community understand the importance of respecting peopleÂ’s rights to have their own beliefs. We are deeply committed to respecting and protecting the rights of others to believe at they choose, and we believe that one of the first principles of respectful conduct and religious practice is to avoid unnecessarily criticizing or confronting othersÂ’ personal beliefs. We cherish the fact that it is possible to discuss our differences with our classmates and neighbors without that discussion erupting into conflict and sowing the seeds of division and disrespect.

We believe that the adhan, issued publicly in a pluralistic setting, does indeed sow those seeds of division and disrespect. It does so by declaring that “there is no lord except God,” and that “Muhammad is the Messenger of God.” To the extent that this statement is a profession of faith, it is benign; however, by virtue of its content, it is also a declaration of religious superiority and a declaration against all beliefs that conflict with those two statements. This puts the adhan in a different class of religious expression than, say, the sounding of church bells or the displaying of a menorah because it publicly advances a theological position. By doing so, it comes precariously close to crossing the line between the legitimate creation of awareness and proselytization. Imagine, if you would, a Southern Baptist evangelist standing atop the steps of Widener Library, exhorting passersby to pray, denying the validity to other faiths, and declaring the divinity of Jesus. Would such an activity be congruent with Harvard’s tradition of liberalism and tolerance?

We do not believe so. Indeed, other religions make truth claims similar to those contained in the adhan, but those claims, as a matter of practice at Harvard, are voiced privately or not at all. The adhan, it seems, is the exception to HarvardÂ’s unspoken rule of religious respect and tolerance.

The authors of this piece do not believe that there is no lord but God. Nor do we believe that Muhammad was GodÂ’s prophet. In fact, we do not believe in prophets. We expect that our statements might be offensive to some, and for that reason, we believe that it wouldnÂ’t be appropriate, in the name of spreading awareness about our beliefs, use a public address system to declare to everyone in Harvard Yard that God is imaginary, that prayer is a waste of time, or that Muhammad was not a prophet. Similarly, it is best that those who hold similar beliefs about Hinduism or Buddhism or any other religion avoid loudly declaring the falsehood of other faiths.

The Harvard community should be very aware of Islam, as it is one of the worldÂ’s most influential religions. We believe that Islam Awareness Week ought to continue, but in a way that does not foist Islamic doctrines upon everyone. We believe that students who resent the forceful infusion of theology with their Harvard experience should be spared the indignity, and we believe strongly that our community should not grant license to any religious group, minority or otherwise, to use a loudspeaker to declare false the profoundly important and personal beliefs of others.

Benjamin Taylor is a graduate of Harvard UniversityÂ’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. Aaron D. Williams and Diana K. Esposito are graduate students at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies
Posted by:john frum

#7  Would Harvard allow the Apostle's Creed to be broadcast from the steps of Widener Library during a hypothetical Catholic Awareness Week?

The question answers itself.
Posted by: Tiny Ulirt4387   2008-03-22 18:02  

#6  They must be pissed that they can't get into the gym when they want any more...
Posted by: tu3031   2008-03-22 16:24  

#5  Not too late to switch to a doctorate in shoelace eyelets...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2008-03-22 15:52  

#4  "I wish them well for the remainder of their graduate studies."

Unfortunately, after speaking up the way they have about the subject they have, I think we'd better wish they live for the remainder of their graduate studies, tw.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-03-22 15:48  

#3  Aaron D. Williams and Diana K. Esposito are graduate students at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies

Indeed, these two writers would certainly have had the opportunity of experiencing Muslim religious attitudes toward non-believers. I wish them well for the remainder of their graduate studies.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-03-22 15:36  

#2  By doing so, it comes precariously close to crossing the line between the legitimate creation of awareness and proselytization. Imagine, if you would, a Southern Baptist evangelist standing atop the steps of Widener Library, exhorting passersby to pray, denying the validity to other faiths, and declaring the divinity of Jesus. Would such an activity be congruent with HarvardÂ’s tradition of liberalism and tolerance?
?

Perhaps not, but it would be congruent with John Harvard's intention in endowing the school which bears his name. So when did the Corporation decide to betray that donor?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-03-22 15:00  

#1  It looks like some liberals are saying "enough".
Posted by: tipover   2008-03-22 14:37  

00:00