You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
The Party of DefeatÂ’s Haditha Lie Crumbles
2008-04-01
THE COLLECTED TALES OF AMERICAN ATROCITIES, WHICH LEFTISTS RELY UPON THE WAY OTHERS SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES FOR SOLACE, is getting shorter. Like allegations of torture at Guantanamo, Koran desecration, and detainee murders in Afghanistan, the Haditha “massacre” is increasingly being exposed as a fairy tale. Unfortunately, this canard was invented and popularized, not by terrorist propagandists to discredit an enemy army, but by American politicians to demonize U.S. soldiers and drain their own nation's will to fight an ongoing war – a war which we are winning and which the same politicians voted to authorize.

Last Friday, the government dismissed all charges against the third of four defendants accused of perpetrating the aforementioned atrocities in Haditha. All charges against Lance Cpl. Stephen Tatum, 26, were dismissed “with prejudice,” meaning Tatum cannot be tried again for the incident, although by the time the trial commenced, the Haditha “massacre” had already shrunken considerably.

Tatum and three others stood accused, not of murdering “innocent civilians in cold blood” as Congressman John Murtha characterized it, but of failing to properly identify every target before opening fire. In reality, terrorists had fired on the squad from inside the house, and the room where innocent people had been killed was smoke-filled; moreover, according to multiple witnesses, everyone heard an AK-47 “racking” – that is, getting ready to fire upon them. A positive identification would have been both impossible and suicidal. The investigating officers report further observed, according to the prosecution's case, Tatum would have been absolved of throwing a grenade into the room without positively identifying everyone inside, but not firing his rifle. The government ultimately found his actions had not violated the rules of engagement.
Posted by:anonymous5089

#4  Murtha should be ashamed of himself.

The only concept of shame he and his party understand is to impose it on others to extort power. They are oblivious to the concept in application to their own words and actions.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-04-01 19:31  

#3  Didn't a couple of them sue him for slander? How's that going?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-04-01 18:03  

#2  Murtha must be seething. He so wanted to hang these Marines out to dry--or just hang them. Murtha should be ashamed of himself. He should resign. Pic makes Murtha look like "rage boy."
Posted by: JohnQC   2008-04-01 14:54  

#1  Murtha needs to be charged with slander, defaming the accused. If he is found guilty and has all his worldly goods taken away, then he needs to be tried for treason and sedition. Then, if found guilty, shot.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-04-01 12:51  

00:00