You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
French PM announces 'several hundred' extra Afghan troops
2008-04-03
France could send "several hundred" extra soldiers to join the NATO force in Afghanistan, Prime Minister Francois Fillon said Tuesday, adding that details of the mission had not yet been decided.
Posted by:Fred

#7  This isn't free - but it's primarily Germany and Britain who are paying rather than us.

Oh, who paid the bills in R&D and field testing?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-04-03 12:40  

#6  If France actually funds her military, then sends troops and material out to fight in the battles of the War on Terror, she is in contention for leading the EU military. Britain has been doing yeoman's work, but they've also been enthusiastically cutting troops and supplies for at least a decade; it is starting to look like giving up the lead, militarily, might well be the choice of governing elite, if not of the citizenry.
Posted by: trailing wife   2008-04-03 12:21  

#5  lotp

Sarkozy has Hungarian roots. Unlike genuine French who were bombarded with heavy communist propganda,were resentful against the US for depriving France of her god-given right to be number 1 in world and in addition were safely hundreds of miles away of the Fulda Gap he grew looking at America as a defnder of freedom.

Don't be overly cynical, part of the move,not all but some of it, is genuine friendship and anither part is that he understands thet we are in the same boat.
Posted by: JFM   2008-04-03 12:11  

#4  This isn't free - but it's primarily Germany and Britain who are paying rather than us.

Sarkozy sees the chill in US-UK relations with Gordo and the failure of Germany to support combat/stability ops in Afghanistan. France is stepping up -- and expects to be seen as leading the EU military as a result.
Posted by: lotp   2008-04-03 11:28  

#3  Quo - You want missile defense?*
Quid - You pony up some troops.

*Why should the Executive have to go to the mat with the Legislative branch on funding for hundreds of millions, if you dudes aren't willing to put a dime to a dollar? If we're going to look at our own bottom line, we can save a lot by not implementing a shield that only serves you.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-04-03 10:09  

#2  its not just the US asking, Canada and UK have also been asking.

I dont know of any specific tangible quid pro quo, but Sarkozy I assume is justifying it at home in terms of general French influence, both in South Asia, and within NATO, and improving the relationship with the US.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2008-04-03 09:05  

#1  Is this some kind of quid pro quo? Since when does the US just ask for something and it comes like manna from heaven?
Posted by: gorb   2008-04-03 02:27  

00:00