You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Putting the Hell in Helmand
2008-04-04
AKHTAR, a well-to-do cloth merchant in his 50s, recalls the optimism Afghans in his province of Helmand felt when the Taliban were defeated in 2001. It is exhausted. “Now we just say everyone should leave us alone.” And that includes British NATO forces. Mr Akhtar speaks for many. In ten days in Helmand this correspondent found no one who would say that British forces had improved things.

As NATO held a summit in Bucharest this week, Mr Akhtar's anger was a salutary reminder of how much it has to do to salvage a respectable outcome from the war. He is just the sort of Afghan who should welcome NATO's efforts to eliminate the Taliban. Yet, like everyone else, he blames the insecurity in Helmand for making life a misery, and his wealth futile.

NATO wants to demonstrate first of all that no ally is withdrawing; on the contrary, France has confirmed it will send another battalion (at least 800 troops). Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, says the mission is succeeding, and urges patience. NATO also stresses a “comprehensive approach”, in which military action is backed up by political and economic progress, eventually allowing Afghan forces to be at the forefront of the fight.
Posted by:Fred

#2  THre is one common point between the screwup Hemand has become and teh crewup Basra has become. The British and tehir low profile aproach.
Posted by: JFM   2008-04-04 10:15  

#1  Peaceful national development runs counter to the islamofascist agenda. They want jihad and sharia. There wasn't peace under the Taliban; those animals waged permawar on the people, while serving as base of international terror war. The Taliban economy was a basket case, with total reliance on Saudi aid. Further, it was both unlawful for women to work and spousal abandonment was legal. Perversely, women couldn't earn a living through work and they couldn't beg. Single women were expected to find husbands, and if they couldn't then they were killed according to sharia prescriptions against "wicked women." (In Muhammad's supposed "night journey" to hell and heaven, he claimed that most persons he saw in hell were female)
Posted by: McZoid   2008-04-04 01:05  

00:01