You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Marines to Re-Deploy to Guam- No, not Murtha's plan
2008-05-06
The Joint Guam Program Office and the government of Guam will hold village meetings next week to discuss the increase of U.S. military forces on Guam. The meetings will include a question and answer session, small-group discussions and information displays. Attendees will include retired Maj. Gen. David F. Bice, head of the program office; Capt. Robert Lee, acting director of the program office in Guam; Rear Adm. William French, commander, Naval Forces Marianas; and other Pentagon officials.

The Joint Guam Program Office will hold a series of village meetings this month to discuss the newly released draft master plan for the anticipated military buildup on Guam.

The plan contains few new details about the proposed move of 8,000 Marines from Okinawa to Guam, a new Army ballistic missile defense unit and a pier capable of receiving an aircraft carrier a few times a year, a military spokesman acknowledged on Thursday.

Marine Corps Capt. Neil A. Ruggiero said the planÂ’s contents are a sign that the military has been as forthcoming as possible during the past two years, since the U.S. and Japan agreed to move III Marine Expeditionary Force from Okinawa to Guam.

“We’ve been keeping the public informed,” Ruggiero said Thursday.

One local legislator disagreed. “I was expecting something a little more definitive,” said Guam Sen. James V. Espladon, a Republican who chairs the island’s Committee on Tourism, Maritime, Military, Veterans and Foreign Affairs. “We waited all this time. We’ve been waiting around for this?”

The 11-page draft plan restates many of the militaryÂ’s objectives for the buildup, including a goal to use existing military-controlled land to absorb the increase in buildings and living spaces.

Most of the future Marine Corps home would be on current Navy and Air Force-controlled land at the northern end of Guam, on Andersen Air Force Base and the Naval and Computer Telecommunications Station at Finegayan.

The possible locations for some training areas have yet to be determined, according to the plan. The military may look for additional land on Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands for both firing and non-firing training areas, the report reads.

No site has been proposed for the ArmyÂ’s air defense unit, the report reads.

The plan is in draft form because the EPA must approve an environmental impact statement before the military can start any construction, Ruggiero said. The military expects a decision on the environmental statement by 2010, according to the draft plan.

A “working-level” master plan is expected out this summer, the plan reads.

The buildup is expected to bring nearly 40,000 servicemembers, family members and workers to the island by 2014. The islandÂ’s current population is about 171,000. The estimated cost of the move is $10.3 billion, with Japan paying about $6 billion of the total.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#5  WAFF.com > US NAVY's FLEET PLANS [Shipbuilding] ENCOUNTERS ROUGH SEAS. Big budget battles loom in Congress for smaller fleet - retirement of USS ENTERPRISE NLT 2014 or 2015???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-05-06 23:07  

#4  I vote for Guam with JosephM in charge. Have fun playing with the Marines, dear!
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-05-06 22:03  

#3  SONGS OF THE THIRD WORLD WAR > "ONE TIN SOLDIER" - Theme from BILLY JACK; + "APU MAGE" by Guam's JD CRUTCH.

In the Bloody Morning after, in the Valley of the Little Big Horn, the villains got a hold of Nixon, She wants to know what Love is, and One Tin Soldier rides away.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-05-06 21:38  

#2  Guam is worrying over News reports of leaked budget-spending report information indic that the 3rd MARDIV and a MAREG may be reloc to HAWAII, NOT GUAM, which is consistent wid 1990's BRAC specul that the US Navy-DOD desired to make Guam a transient and R&R Port, i.e. US Milfors will come only for Training and under War Emergency. MORE > third-party sources - THE MARINE RELOC TO GUAM, FULL OR IN PART OR NONE, IS STILL CONSISTENT WID US REGIONAL PLANNING SCENARIOS, INCLUDING PULLOUT, FROM GUAM-WESTPAC NLT 2040-2050. I've been told that Guam could be offered unilateral formal independence from the USA anytime after 2015, as due to:

* advances in super-technology
* no major war occurring bwtn major world states.
* decline in natural resources
* US-specific costs as per Domestic/Homeland
Security
* Radical Islamist-Terror threat being mostly defeated or confined to historical regions or enclaves, i.e. NO EXPANSION OF THREAT.

NET > US MIL PLANS > MOSTLY TO COUNTER LOCAL INSURGENCIES AGROSS THE GLOBE/WORLD, NO LONGER TO FIGHT ANY "BIG/GREAT POWER" CONFLICT ALBEIT WILL STILL PLAN FOR THESE. E.g. "GLOBAL TASK FORCE" = "1000-FLAG/NATION" OWG NAVY?

I'VE BEEN TELLING LOCAL PEOPLE FOR A LONG TIME NOW THAT GUAM'S LEADERS HAD BETTER MAKE CERTAIN THAT THE MARINES COME, becuz said Reloc remains subject to the whims of National-Global Politics + Politicians, that the Reloc is NOT SET IN STONE, + THAT GUAM'S BUSINESS-POL SECTOR ARE UNILATER PUTTING THEMSELVES IN FOR A WORLD OF $$$ HURT IFF THESE MARINES EITHER DON'T COME OR THE BUILDUP IS NOT AS BIG AS ANTICIPATED. I've also been telling locals that the BEST PROTECTION GUAM CAN GIVE ITSELF AS PER THIS BUILDUP-RELOC IS A VOTE ON FORMAL SELF-DETERMINATION, as Guam will be coming up agz other Pols in the halls of Congress whom will argue WHY SHOULD A DE FACTO US STATE LOSE BIG $$$ TO A AN UNINCORPOR TERRITORY WHOM CAN'T FORMALLY OR OFFICIALLY DECIDE IFF IT WANTS TO BE PART OF THE USA OR NOT.

WOT > WAR FOR OWG-NWO > "STATUS QUO" IS NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE OR TOLERABLE, which for Guam means GUAM CANNOT KEEP RIDING FOREVER THE "MIDDLE/GREY LINE" OF AMBIGUOUS PCORRECT/DENIABLE POLITICS. WOT > Guam must choose bwtn FORMAL STATEHOOD versus FORMAL INDEPENDENCE vv USA LEST IT RISK LOSING HAVING SAY IN ITS OWN DESTINY.

At least those HAWAIIAN INDIGENS ACTIVISTS have had legal recognition and certain rights from the US Congress since the turn of the early 20th Century - ITS 2008 AND COUNTING IN THE 21ST CENTURY, AND GUAM'S INDIGENOUS, ETC. LOCAL RSIDENTS WILL HAVE LITTLE TO NO FORMAL PROTECTED RIGHTS AS SUCH TO HELP AND PREVAIL AGZ THESE LOOMING NEW PRESSURES, TO INCLUDE POTENTIAL INDEPENDENCE FROM THE USA BEFORE 2050.

D *** NG IT, GUAM'S IDENTITY = IT HAS NO IDENTITY, SAVE FOR "WHAT DO YOU OR THIRD PARTY(S) THINK WE ARE???

AGAIN, GUAM > after 2010 it become subjected to various escalatory Local, Regional and Global Pressures which potens can forever alter its traditional establishment and historical identity, most certainly for many future generations. 2008 - 2012/13 IS NOT JUST PER THE USA VERSUS RADICAL ISLAM-TERROR ONLY.

*2008 - 2012 [2020] > WAR FOR OWG-NWO = ITS FOR THE WORLD, INCLUDING GUAM, AND NOT JUST BECUZ OF TERROR!

OWG MADONNA + HER DEAD GHOSTSOLDIER/WARRIOR-LOVER.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-05-06 21:30  

#1  The massive AI Infrastructure build over the last several years points to even larger things. Likely a war-fighting center under AI2008 C&C.
Posted by: Goober Sheart1231   2008-05-06 09:04  

00:00