| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Democrats quietly send word to Clinton it's over |
| 2008-05-08 |
|
| Posted by:Fred |
| #15 How about "because their Marxists?" It wouldn't make any difference to me if HRC and BHO were both six-foot-tall men of Swiss ancestory with blond hair: their economic and social veiws do not cut it. |
| Posted by: Secret Master 2008-05-08 23:08 |
| #14 TW, please sit down and have drink of this cool water; smn ain't getting back up anytime soon! (BTW smn: i dislike HRC for her lying crap, and Obamaran=madingdong for the blatant and very publis disrespect he has shown for our flag; spending a very large chunk of my life defending it kind of biased me thataway. neither one are fit to clean the toilets in the WH, much less use them) |
| Posted by: USN, Ret. 2008-05-08 14:49 |
| #13 Just for clarification, you'll notice I didn't address your characterizations about the Clintons, mostly because I really don't care. There are plenty of others who don't like them for a number of reasons, none of which seem to be "because she's female", just as none of the objections I've read here about Obama are "because he's black". As for your question, why does she have to stick herself in the middle when it's your man Obama's turn to be the Democratic candidate, I'm afraid it doesn't work like that -- there is no taking turns when national office is at stake. Finally, the purpose of the party convention is for the delegates to bloody well negotiate until a candidate is chosen, not to crown the one tapped in a smoky back room somewhere. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2008-05-08 14:40 |
| #12 What if you are any or all that, smn? What if, perchance, I am (sexual references changed, of course). What if a significant number of Rantburgers are? I don't know, and neither do you, but your posts present the assumption that we here are all lily white, and those that don't adore Candidate Obama as you do are either anti-Black or afraid to be thought nigger lovers, a term that as far as I'm aware went out in the 1970s. If coming off as a black racist is not your intent, than choose much more carefully the meaning of the words and phrases and accusations you post. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2008-05-08 14:31 |
| #11 trailing wife, what if I'm white with a black wife, and have empathy, or mixed race such as Obama...and 'understand' motives? I don't like this 'tip toeing' and 'whispering' around the Clinton's when it comes to their negative campaign tactics; it smells of others being held 'hostage' by what they (the Clintons)know or could do! |
| Posted by: smn 2008-05-08 11:44 |
| #10 That'll be the first time Bill's head would be there in.... how many years? /Sorry - had to be snarked.... |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2008-05-08 11:43 |
| #9 Maybe she'll wake up some morning with Bill's severed head in her bed... |
| Posted by: tu3031 2008-05-08 11:38 |
| #8 No! No! No, you &%$#*! I've already ordered the drapes. |
| Posted by: HRC 2008-05-08 11:37 |
| #7 And there is grinning Satan, telling her that all the contract specified was that she could run for President, not that she would become President. And now that the contract is fulfilled... |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2008-05-08 09:33 |
| #6 "When the fight is over, one guy's still standing. And THAT'S how you know who won." -- The Untouchables |
| Posted by: mojo 2008-05-08 09:05 |
| #5 smn, you talk like a black racist. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2008-05-08 07:48 |
| #4 sorry smn, your '''' tread water like a 3 legged jackalope; pleae clarify. Yes it would appear that president William Clinton sabotaged Senator Clinton's campaign but that was probably the scotch and burger talking. Perhaps the knave could show us a more ~illinois~ way of living... |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2008-05-08 05:39 |
| #3 swksvolFF, I believe Bill Clinton is so 'hardlined' into his goals and aspirations for Hillary, that he would spurn or sabotage the Democratic Party, if it's 'machine' disrespected or dissed his wife. Recompense for her not divorcing him following the Monica affair revelation! That's why the DNC and other Donks are threading 'lightly' and 'quietly'! |
| Posted by: smn 2008-05-08 05:24 |
| #2 smn, your comments have been consistant King George, Queen Hillary, so then the Knave O'bama. This is America, so why all the royaly references? So he was seen drinking the King of Beers, so he is related to Cheney, so his grand mama was wrong when she sould have been wright - do we really want the chicago way of life over the country; example when guns are taken away but then the police want to be armed with assault rifles? Never mind the judge appointees...why that would be social engineering - that kind of change? Or is it the other change I'll notice; Abraham Lincoln is a good friend of mine, leave him for others all the time. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2008-05-08 04:39 |
| #1 Bill Clinton's influence has well permeated Queen Hillary. His 'Little Sweet Nutthins" whispered into her ears will drag the Democratic Party to the edge if not over at the Convention; just as McGovern has warned! The 'R'ace Card is the most powerful lure a politician could deploy, more than money, more than gender, more than religion! This card can even be used among all whites; let's not forget the stigma of 'N' lovers from slavery through Jim Crow! Bill Clinton will 'push' his wife to the 'last man standing' scenario not unlike his brick wall stance during the Starr investigation during his years; he knows what is IS! And, since the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment in August, 1920, white women has had atleast 22 real chances (being atleast 50 percent of the majority population), to elect a white female. Why hasn't that happened, and why must it happen NOW, being that the first black man President in the nation's history is within reach? Maybe that's why the first 43 Presidents were all white males...the 'crab mentality' among other groups is what's keeping that 'glass ceiling' from ever being cracked!! |
| Posted by: smn 2008-05-08 03:56 |