You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
As Baghdad grapples with Sadr City, Iraqi Kurdistan busily builds 'Dream City'
2008-05-08
The Shia controll Iraq but can't get their act together. The Kurds are doing fine. What's the difference? Simple, the Kurds are not Arabs!
Ahem. Nothing wrong with Arabs per se. Ask Michael Yon. The Kurds have had longer to get their acts together (from the time the no-fly zone was established), and it shows. Give the rest of the country another 8 years (the time the no-fly zone was in place prior to the war) and let's see what Basra looks like.
Arbil and Sulaymaniyah, Iraq - Shakir Wajid showed off his company's plans for "Kurdistan Gas City" – a futuristic residential, commercial, and industrial city that will run entirely on natural gas. "We believe there are huge gas reserves under the ground in Kurdistan," says Mr. Wajid, an Iraqi Kurd and executive with United Arab Emirates-based Dana Gas, whose company is in the final stages of negotiating over a 14.7 square mile plot of land for the $20 billion project.

Dana Gas has already invested $650 million in Iraqi Kurdistan to extract gas, build a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) plant, and transport the fuel to new power plants in the region. "This area will transform economically in a massive way.Â… It will be a revolution," says Wajid from his office in the northern Iraqi city of Sulaymaniyah.

Further north in Arbil, the region's capital, authorities are finalizing a deal estimated at $12 billion with a consortium of South Korean companies that will give the energy-starved Asian country access to several oil fields here in exchange for investment in infrastructure projects in northern Iraq.

Over the past year, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) has briskly awarded oil exploration and production contracts to foreign companies. The roster now includes the likes of America's Hunt oil, Austria's OMV, and Russia's TNK-BP. And all of this is happening in defiance of the oil ministry and the central government in Baghdad.

But as the government of this semiautonomous region, home to about 4.5 million people, forges ahead with its ambitions to transform this long deprived part of Iraq, it must maneuver through many external and internal challenges.

For average Iraqis, and some in the central government, Iraqi Kurdistan's actions are nothing short of its efforts to lay the foundations for independence. In many neighboring countries, particularly Turkey, which is waging a war with its own separatist Kurdish rebels, sometimes in Iraqi Kurdistan, this is cause for alarm. Last Thursday, the KRG held rare talks in Baghdad with senior Turkish officials partly to allay these concerns.

Even inside the region, discontent is rising among many residents who see little benefit from big projects and are starting to question the motives and capabilities of the two main ruling parties – the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) the Patriotic Union for Kurdistan (PUK) - that have had a grip on power for decades.

Beyond the crumbling old buildings of Arbil's center an entire district is in the making: New Hawler. Cranes stretch into the sky as foreign laborers toil on the building sites of hotels, office towers, and gated communities with names like Dream City and Italian City. Signs of wealth are everywhere. You see it in the shopping malls and gleaming cars.

At Empire World, a $365 million housing and commercial development being built by wealthy Kurdish businessmen who have benefited from US contracts in Iraq, manager Basma Azouz says villas in the project that average $250,000 are being sold at a fast clip. Many families of rich Iraqis and Baghdad-based government officials have over the past few years opted to live in the relative safety of northern Iraq.

"Have you seen the other Iraq? It's spectacular. It's peaceful. It's joyful. Fewer than 200 US troops are stationed here," says a promotional campaign for investment in the Kurdistan region.

During a recent interview, Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani spoke with passion about his vision for the region, which he says can serve as a model for the rest of Iraq and a "steppingstone" for investment in the rest of a country that has some of the world's largest untapped oil reserves. "We just want to rebuild our region as part of Iraq, that's it. We are not a threat to anybody. We want to be a factor of stability," says Mr. Barzani, denying that his region eyes secession.

His foreign relations adviser, Falah Mustafa, says that while 97.5 percent of Kurds in the region support the idea based on the results of an informal referendum in 2005, it would be unrealistic. "It's better for us to go for something that's achievable and viable. We did not push too hard, we did not go unrealistic."

Barzani says his government's decision to start awarding oil and gas contracts to foreign investors – before a much-delayed national hydrocarbons law has been agreed on with Baghdad – is in keeping with the spirit of the new Iraqi Constitution. He says the heart of the dispute with Baghdad is that his region is committed to a federal Iraq, which many in Baghdad seem to be backing away from.

But Iraq's Oil Minister Hussein al-Shahristani has accused Kurdistan of signing the contracts "secretly and without competition." "It did not give Iraq the highest possible return," he says, adding that all companies that have inked deals with Kurdistan have been blacklisted.

On April 22, Barzani said he was "very optimistic" that an agreement would be reached with Baghdad even though it "may take time" to work out oil contracts and other sticking issues, such as the resolution of disputed territories.

Although average Kurds admire their youthful-looking prime minister, many see the new prosperity as feeding corruption. Ari Harsin, an Arbil journalist with the weekly Awene, says that members of the KDP and PUK hold stakes in almost every development project. "In Kurdistan the politburos of the KDP and PUK decide where the budget goes," says Mr. Harsin. "There is no transparency. People do not understand how these oil deals are going to benefit them. Sometimes it's almost like a mafia state."
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#10  IIRC, STARS-N-STRIPES [paraph] > KURDS THREATEN TO ATTACK US INTERESTS, as "PUNISHMENT" for US INTEL etc. + OTHER SUPPORT GIVEN TO TURKEY IN LATTER'S MILOPS AGZ KURDS IN IRAQ.

Also IIRC, SAME > KURDS > proclaiming to REVIEW OR RECONSIDER THEIR PRIOR SUPPOR OF US EFFORTS IN IRAQ + REGION???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-05-08 22:39  

#9  the other arabs in iraq are too busy about div=ying it up . ht e kurdss eem too be mor enuisness man like rather thatn give this or fuck you. From what i have seen about kirkuk alot of comps. andare moving there andthere is some real prime real estate
Posted by: sinse   2008-05-08 15:13  

#8  "It did not give Iraq the highest possible return," he says

Translation: I didn't get my bribe from this seperate deal, and I'm pissed beyond belief because as an official of the Petroleum Ministry, bribes are my birthright.
Posted by: gromky   2008-05-08 14:56  

#7  Maybe the Arabs in Iraq will sort it out like the Lebanese.
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2008-05-08 14:37  

#6  Maybe it's because it's too hot & humid to even move in Basra for half the year but up in the Kurdish area they can still get things done in the summer.
Posted by: Menhadden Snogum6713   2008-05-08 13:06  

#5  #3

1. I think there is room for secularism among arabs - see Tunisia, for ex, but thats too big to resolve here. Clearly one of the things that makes it easier for non-arab muslims to secularize is the existence of a strong local ethnic identity - Arabs to counter pan Islamism need either A. Pan Arabism - a dead end or B. Loyalty to relatively artificial local states - the hope, but difficult to achieve

2. The Kurds suffered under Saddam as did the Shiites. When the Kurds got their nofly zone, they had autonomy - cause the mountains and their military skills - honed by resistance from before Saddam was even in power, made them defensible. Shia were in flat ground, open to armor.

3. KDP and PUK were pragmatic. Maybe partly an ethnic trait. Partly due to the situation of having a quasistate to share. And partly because of a tradition of socialist secularism, that had an easier time adapting to the market economy than Shia radicalism has in adapting to the modern age.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2008-05-08 12:26  

#4  The Kurdish KDP and PUK figured out a way to share power and thrive.

After a civil war in 1995 and lots of fighting before that. We pretty much knocked their heads together and told them that if they didn't stop fighting, we'd pull the no-fly zone. That woke them up.

I agree with LH's comments: the Kurds do seem to be more practical and secularist, but let's give the rest of Iraq time. The Sunni sheiks are all about business and deals: as long as they get theirs they can be pretty reasonable. Likewise, the Iraqi Shi'a are more business-oriented than their Iranian cousins.
Posted by: Steve White   2008-05-08 12:09  

#3  LH:
1. Predominately Sunni but like the Turks room for secularism. Unlike Arabs.

2. The Kurds had a long way to go after thousand of villages were destroyed, ethnic cleansing, starving in the mountains in the early 90s. The Shia Arabs were protected by a No-Fly zone also but couldn't figure out what to do with it.

3. The Kurdish KDP and PUK figured out a way to share power and thrive. The Arab Badr and Mahdi fight for power.

I still think it's an Arab thingy to crap in your own bed.
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2008-05-08 11:58  

#2  Another advantage is that arab speaking suicide bomber wannbees have to negotiate a lot of Kurdish speaking territory to get where they want to go if they want to blow stuff up in Kurdistan.

Another difference is that if Kurdistan was a State, its electoral votes would go to the GOP.

Posted by: mhw   2008-05-08 11:39  

#1  other differences

1. The Kurds are historically secularist, the Shia not so much

2. The Kurds had 12 years of self rule outside of Saddams control before OIF. The Shia did not.

And special for Rantburg

3. The leading Kurdish parties, the KDP and PUK, are historically Social Democrat. The leading Shia parties, not so much.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2008-05-08 11:05  

00:00