You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
The Climate Security Act: Reject this nonsense
2008-05-25
The giant smack delivered by the Law of Unintended Consequences in this nation's rush to embrace ethanol really smarted. Not only has it contributed to higher food prices domestically, it also has played a significant role in a world food shortage -- something the Bush administration now is desperately trying to spin. But as the saying goes, you likely ain't seen nothin' yet. Just wait until Congress passes something misleadingly called the Climate Security Act.

The idea behind the bill is to reduce carbon dioxide, supposedly one of the major "greenhouse gases" that are, again supposedly, leading to a dire warming of our planet. Never mind that the "settled science" of global warming hardly is -- and never mind the scientific evidence of cooling -- the Climate Security Act stands to do serious, if not irreparable, harm to an already struggling economy.

Concludes an in-depth analysis by The Heritage Foundation:
• The act "represents an extraordinary level of economic interference by the federal government."

• It "promises extraordinary perils for the American economy."

• "Arbitrary restrictions predicated on multiple, untested and underdeveloped technologies will lead to severe restrictions on energy use and large increases in energy costs."

• Special interests have wealth transferred to them at the cost of the energy-using public.
The Climate Security Act is the definition of a crock. It's an ill-defined solution to a "problem" that's dubious to begin with. Congress must reject such nonsense. Congress must serve reason.
Posted by:Fred

#2  I'd get on that bandwagon.

The giant smack delivered by the Law of Unintended Consequences in this nation's rush to embrace ethanol really smarted. Not only has it contributed to higher food prices domestically, it also has played a significant role in a world food shortage...

Must be that we (the U.S.) are feeding a large portion of the world to have that kind of effect. Maybe, some of the countries that are having problems should step up to the plate and feed their own rather than stir up trouble in the world for us and others. Maybe they should spend their money growing food rather than on arms. Maybe some of the countries that are having problems should stop trying to kill us.
Posted by: JohnQC   2008-05-25 17:37  

#1  At some point, there will be a voter uprising when some gifted speaker runs on a platform of a 50% reduction in the size of government, and has coattails that bring enough new blood into congress to make it happen.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-05-25 00:58  

00:00