You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
McCain attacks Guantánamo ruling
2008-06-14
John McCain on Friday described the decision by the Supreme Court to allow Guantánamo Bay prisoners to challenge their detention in US courts as “one of the worst decisions in the history of this country”. The Republican presidential candidate said he agreed with the four dissenting justices on the nine-member court that foreign fighters held at the detention camp were not entitled to the rights of US citizens.

He criticised Barack Obama, his Democratic opponent, for supporting the decision and said it highlighted the importance of nominating conservative judges to the Supreme Court. His remarks represented a hardening of his position from his more moderate initial response to the ruling on Thursday, signalling a strategic decision by the McCain campaign to make it an election issue.

Mr McCain’s stance appeared designed to demonstrate his toughness on national security, while casting Mr Obama as soft on terrorists. It also looked calculated to spark debate on the future of the Supreme Court – one of the most important election issues for many conservative voters.

Mr McCain, who spent five years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam, had previously sought to distance himself from Mr Bush on the treatment of detainees, arguing for Guantánamo to be closed and torture to be banned. He said he stood by those positions on Friday but insisted the Supreme Court ruling would weaken national security. “These are enemy combatants, these are people who are not citizens, they are not and never have been given the rights that the citizens of this country have,” he said. “Our first obligation is the safety and security of this nation and the men and women who defend it. This decision will harm our ability to do that.”
Posted by:Steve White

#3  This will no doubt fix in his mind the kind of judge he will nominate to the Supreme Court to replace the retirees, a very good thing. Three terms of war-mongering Republican presidents will have definitely changed the course of this country for the better part of a generation.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-06-14 10:53  

#2  A fair number of these prisoners who have been released have shown up on the battlefield again trying to kill Americans and allies. You have to wonder about the Supremes.
Posted by: JohnQC   2008-06-14 09:49  

#1  Good. Now if he has to work within that crap precedent, reverse onus laws - viz habeas corpus/release - can be strengthened. Isn't it strange that this junk is dumped on the public, at Summer recess? Reminder: Saudi Arabia pays legal fees for 100% of their citizens who are in foreign custody.
Posted by: McZoid   2008-06-14 01:51  

00:00