You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Funds for 'Sons of Iraq' drying up?
2008-06-20
Beaureaucratic rules trump common sense.

SHARQAT, Iraq — Military leaders in northern Iraq are pushing to draw down the "Sons of Iraq" program in their part of the country and plan to cut off funding for many of the groups just one month before the provincial elections scheduled for November.

The groups are paid neighborhood watches that began spontaneously when Sunnis turned against al-Qaida in Iraq and other Sunni insurgent groups. American leaders began supporting them financially, and many military leaders have since credited the groups with turning around IraqÂ’s security situation.

The process in northern Iraq could be a harbinger for how it is done by American units in other parts of the country. The decision to cut off funding has some soldiers worried that Iraq could lose some of its hard-won security gains when the groups disappear.

"Them getting rid of the ‘Sons of Iraq’ is going to be one of the biggest mistakes they’ve made," said 1st Sgt. Michael Livingston, a 1st Squadron, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment soldier who has worked extensively with the security volunteers in the Ninevah and Salah ad Din provinces.

Col. Michael A. Bills, the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment commander, made the decision to terminate the "Sons of Iraq" contracts in the areas under his control, which comprise all of Ninevah province and part of Salah ad Din province. Most of the 3rd ACRÂ’s "Sons of Iraq" groups are clustered around Qayyarah. The 3rd ACR does not have any of the groups in Mosul.

Bills’ decision is part of a bigger push from Multi-National Division—North. Officials originally set a firm date for ending the program because the contract money came from funds that could only be used for "temporary critical infrastructure protection," said Capt. Matt Rodano, the officer in charge of reconciliation issues for MND—North. They read that phrase to mean one year after a program started.

"That kind of became the date where those contracts were going to turn into pumpkins," Rodano said.

The programÂ’s success made them remove the hard date and leave it up to the discretion of the commander overseeing the contracts. But they still pushed to "pursue an aggressive plan," he said.

Numbers have fallen from a peak of about 31,500 in MND-N to about 30,700. Rodano couldnÂ’t say exactly where he expects those numbers to be in October.

"Our intent is to get down pretty significantly by the end of the year," he said.

Lt. Col. Thomas Dorame, the 1-3 ACR commander, said he learned about the October funding deadline a few months ago. Dorame said Iraqi soldiers often tell him that theyÂ’ve heard the Iraqi government plans to pick up the tab, but he said heÂ’s never been able to confirm those rumors.

Dorame said part of the reasoning is financial. American money is paying for the groups at a time when coalition leaders are transferring responsibility and costs to the Iraqi government. U.S. officials also never asked the Iraqi government to approve the groups, although the Iraqi government doesnÂ’t officially oppose them.

Most importantly, no one envisioned the "Sons of Iraq" as a permanent part of the Iraqi security forces. Some Shiite government leaders have questioned the wisdom of supporting armed groups in a movement that originated among Sunnis.

"The ‘Sons of Iraq’ were never a long-term solution, nor do we want them to be a long-term solution," Dorame said. "They were to fill legitimate security gaps and to buy us time."

But the groups have also provided jobs in a country where more than half of the young men in many cities are unemployed.

Ali Achmet, a Sharqat "Sons of Iraq" member, is typical of many. He had no job until he joined the organization four months ago and depended upon his brother for money. Now he makes $200 to $300 a month.

"We are making Iraq safe," he said.

Similarly, many insurgents only targeted American and Iraqi forces because of the money al-Qaida and other insurgent groups paid them, according to Dorame and Capt. Samuel Cook, the commander of 1-3Â’s Crazyhorse Troop. The program effectively allowed the Americans to outbid the insurgents for IraqÂ’s fighting-age males. Works for me.

With the program gone, poor young men might return to being insurgents–— if not for ideology, then for necessity.

"This is the worst news that I’ve heard," said Khamis Salah Allawi Al Jameli, a "Sons of Iraq" leader in Sharqat. "Believe me, if they destroy the ‘Sons of Iraq,’ the terrorists, they’re going to come back."

The absence of security volunteers will also force more American soldiers into the labor-intensive job of guarding IraqÂ’s roads. Cook estimates that "Sons of Iraq" checkpoints free up his workload by about a third to a half.

"You talk about drawing down the surge and then past the surge, and then you draw down the [Sons of Iraq] before the police are ready for them? YouÂ’re just asking for trouble," he said.

Dorame, Cook and Livingston acknowledge the "Sons of Iraq" were always a temporary solution.

The goal has always been to phase out the program and transition its members into longer term jobs, such as with the Iraqi security forces. While many are eager to join the Iraqi police, many want to avoid the Iraqi army because they can be transferred away from their homes. The Americans are encouraging all the volunteers to apply, but Dorame is hoping 30 percent to 40 percent of his security volunteers actually transfer over.

Rodano said 568 of the volunteers have been moved into the Iraqi police and 153 into a work training program.

But instead of a hard end date, some would like to see the program phased out, perhaps with a 10 percent drawdown each month. This would give the men more time to find jobs and give the area more time to absorb all the extra workers.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#3  Also, why let this money pollute the political process if there are elections coming up? Some of it would surely be diverted for political purposes...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2008-06-20 19:06  

#2  I hear Iraq's economy has been growing nicely, which means more jobs for the lads, not to mention both the Iraqi Army and Iraqi Police have been heroes in the latest fighting against the Shiite insurgents. Then, too, it's kind of hard to go back to being an insurgent when all the neighbors know you were fighting them just last week... and tail-end insurgents are considered so uncool that even little girls are telling the soldiers where they keep their weapons stashes. Finally, I thought Congress was about to send President Bush exactly the military budget he'd demanded, which means there should be money for everything necessary, shortly.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-06-20 17:24  

#1  It's hard to say how this will turn out. A big part of the reason there were no jobs previously was because al Qaeda spent its time shaking down and blowing up businesses. If al Qaeda is eliminated, I imagine businesses will return and start investing in the kind of infrastructure that brings jobs galore. It's also kind of a waste of money to have people carrying rifles when they could be contributing to the economy. The key is making the transition smooth.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2008-06-20 15:15  

00:00