You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
NATO allies pledge help to Canada in Afghanistan
2008-07-27
KABUL - NATO countries have agreed to send more troops to the volatile south of Afghanistan, Canada's foreign minister said on Saturday, and another 200 Canadian troops could also be deployed. Canada has some 2,500 soldiers in Afghanistan, most of them stationed in the southern province of Kandahar where they have suffered one of the worst casualty rates fighting a resilient Taleban insurgency.

"We've been talking with our NATO allies and in fact we do now have commitments to increase the number of troops particularly in the Kandahar region," Canadian Foreign Minister David Emerson told a news conference in Kabul. "We're really more comforted that the troop support is being increased in an appropriate way," he said.

In 2006, Canadian troops took over operations in Kandahar, the Taleban's former de-facto capital. Faced with some of the fiercest fighting in Afghanistan, Canada has criticised other countries for refusing to send troops to the south, where the insurgency is strongest.

Asked if Canada was going to increase its own contingent in Afghanistan, Emerson said it could send some 200 soldiers. "Canada does have 2,500 troops here in Afghanistan and that number could expand to 2,700 as more equipment arrives," he said. "We are really talking about a significant increase in the contribution from other countries and that contribution has been forthcoming," he said.

Emerson, on his first trip to Afghanistan since taking office in May, said he had visited "his team" in Kandahar and Kabul to ensure they were well organised. Asked if more troops were the only solution in Afghanistan, Emerson said there needed to be a more "complete reconciliation". "But it is going to take some military capacity and military activity to get Afghanistan to the point where a more comprehensive, a more permanent solution can take effect," he said.
Posted by:Steve White

#8  Afghanistan is going to be a problem as long as there's not a direct logistical link to a seacoast, or friendly neighbors. The only way Pakistan is going to be friendly is if they control Afghanistan. The northern Stans and Iran don't necessarily want to be friendly, either. The best option is to give Afghanistan a seacoast - at the expense of pakistan, which is a failed state, and a failed idea. Get rid of Pakistan, divide its territory between Afghanistan and India, and most of the crap in South Asia stops. It's NOT going to stop until pakistan is gone. The sooner the better.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2008-07-27 13:54  

#7  On charter flights: I meant no disrespect. The USAF uses them as well; seems there's never enough airlift capacity where and when you want it. 

NATO countries frequently use charters to move their people in and out of theater. I don't have a problem with it. Note the SALIS consortium in the referenced article that the Euros use to get airlift capacity when needed.
Posted by: Steve White   2008-07-27 12:05  

#6  I see no names are mentioned. That's always a good sign.
Posted by: tu3031   2008-07-27 11:13  

#5   Charter flights.

As of January, 2008, Canada has already taken delivery of two C-17s and has used them for missions to Afghanistan and other distant parts. LINK

Posted by: mrp   2008-07-27 11:10  

#4  ...to actually do anything useful, or when they will land in-country?

And eat up the logistics and lift needed by front line fighting troops.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-07-27 09:27  

#3  How lovely that the Canadians have managed to prise a number committment from their European allies. Any news on whether these new troops will be allowed by their governments to actually do anything useful, or when they will land in-country?
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-07-27 08:23  

#2  Charter flights.
Posted by: Steve White   2008-07-27 01:12  

#1  And they're going to get to Afghanistan how, exactly?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-07-27 00:36  

00:00