You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
McCain meandering, sometimes bumbling, old fellow - kiss that myth goodbye
2008-08-19
David Gergen, AC360° Contributor, CNN Senior Political Analyst

Heading into the candidates' appearances on Saturday night at Saddleback Church, the conventional wisdom in politics was Barack Obama should have a clear upper hand in any joint appearance with John McCain -- one the young, eloquent, cool, charismatic dude who can charm birds from the trees, the other the meandering, sometimes bumbling, old fellow who can barely distinguish Sunnis from Shiias.

Well, kiss that myth goodbye.

McCain came roaring out of the gate from the first question and was a commanding figure throughout the night as he spoke directly and often movingly about his past and the country's future. By contrast, Obama was often searching for words and while far more thoughtful, was also less emotionally connective with his audience.

To be sure, Obama held on to the loyalty of his own supporters -- many have written in blog sites since how much they respected both his nuanced answers and the honesty of his convictions, especially his Christian faith.

There is no evidence that he lost ground through Saddleback. Moreover, Democrats can poke lots of holes in McCain's arguments and can charge that he is too much the warrior who would be too quick to send troops hither and yon. So, there is much for Democrats to chew on.

But the point is that McCain showed that he can be a much more formidable and effective campaigner in a joint appearance than hardly anyone imagined. The debates this fall are going to be pivotal to the final outcome of the election, and McCain gave a clear wake-up call to the Obama team that he may be much tougher to beat than expected.

Moreover, McCain is now on a sustained roll in his campaign. Since the time he shook up his organization a few weeks ago, he has been much more focused and has started to get through to voters. Democrats -- and the press -- didn't like the quality of those ads, but they seem to have worked politically. His stand on drilling and on Russia have also strengthened his aura of command. And now Saddleback.

That's quite a run and it is reflected in the polls: not only have the national numbers tightened up but McCain has actually moved ahead (slightly) in three key battleground states: Ohio, Virginia and Colorado.

A web site that averages all significant polls, RealClearPolitics.com, has previously projected that just looking at polls, Obama was ahead in states with over 300 electoral votes; now he is down to 275 -- a tiny cushion since 270 is the magical number for winning.

At Saddleback, Obama surely held on to his base support but McCain strengthened his and probably appealed to some undecideds, too.

In short, the tide is moving for the first time in the Republican direction. And the realization is setting in that McCain might just win.

We are still many weeks away from the election and the overall landscape clearly favors the Democrats, but these latest developments put pressure on Obama and his party to pull themselves together or face a stunning upset. What must they do? For starters:

Obama must select a running mate who gives a lift to his campaign and can also hammer home a message in the convention and in the vice presidential debate this fall. He definitely needs a fighter by his side. (For my money, Hillary Clinton looks better and better; if not her, Joe Biden is probably the best fighter -- perhaps Evan Bayh, or a surprise choice.)
The Democratic convention in Denver has to be a roaring success, not only uniting the party but sending a much clearer, crisper message about why 4 more years will be 4 more years of tears.

Obama himself must find his voice again, not only in his acceptance address but in the debates. He needs to bring passion as well as inspiration, a clear sense of what the choice is, and a compelling sense of why he is strong enough as well as wise enough to lead the country through tough times.

In the meantime, the message of the moment is that John McCain is no old fuddy-duddy who isn't sure where he is going; he was on fire at Saddleback and for the first time, he looks like he could win in November.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#7  Hey, I think it would be cool if Tom Ridge got picked as VP for McCain. Why? I went to high school with him - we were classmates in German class for two years.
Other than that, though, I would not pick him - although he is nominally Catholic, he has long been pro-abortion.
The problem is, that since the choice is only between McCain and Obama (or Hillary), on balance the Republicans are more pro-life than the Democrats.
Posted by: Rambler in California   2008-08-19 18:59  

#6  So, is being pro-choice not a liability in this campaign where conservatives are already weary of McCain? That being said, Penn. has more NRA members than any other state, and they are a bit bitter as am I. Rush Limbaugh, whatever his comments are worth, came out today and warned against Ridge because of his pro-choice stance. Homeland Security director...a liability or an asset. I haven't heard anything from conservatives related to Ridge except from Limbaugh.
Posted by: EHLTB   2008-08-19 18:48  

#5  Tom Ridge from Wikipedia:

After his first year at the Dickinson School of Law, he was drafted into the United States Army, where he served as an infantry staff sergeant during the Vietnam War. He earned the Bronze Star, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Later he was offered a position as an officer but turned it down when he learned that it would require an extra year of service.

In 1994, despite being little-known outside of northwest Pennsylvania, Ridge ran for governor of Pennsylvania, winning the election as a pro-choice Republican. He was reelected in 1998 with 57 percent of the vote in a four-way race. Ridge's share of the vote was the highest for a Republican governor in Pennsylvania (where Democrats outnumber Republicans by almost 500,000) in more than half a century.[2] Ridge served as Governor until his resignation to become the Director of Homeland Security in 2001.

As governor, he promoted "law and order" policies, supporting a three-strikes law and a faster death penalty process. A death penalty supporter,[3] Ridge signed more than 224 execution warrants[4] – five times the number signed over a 25-year period by the two previous governors – and oversaw three executions. On social issues, he opposed gay marriage, and, in spite of being a Roman Catholic, is pro-choice on abortion issues.
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2008-08-19 18:31  

#4  I'm willing to wait for the announcement. This election is about the presidential candidates; it won't be decided on who the candidates pick for their #2. If it were #3, that would be different, of course. ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-08-19 18:29  

#3  Word on the street today says Ridge has already been picked. In my mind, a mistake. Why Ridge? Don't they know they need a conservative not married to Bush II? Why not Pawlenty? What the hell does Ridge bring to the table?
Posted by: EHLTB   2008-08-19 18:20  

#2  He keeps the mormon thing in check usually. They can be a pain in the ass too, in a wholesome kind of way.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-08-19 17:33  

#1  I'm casting my vote for McCain. Hope he picks Romney for VP. Don't know if the Mormon thing would be too much, but Jindahl is good too, although inexperienced. Everyone else is too gay or too stodgy.
Posted by: ex-lib   2008-08-19 14:43  

00:00