You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Tomb of the Unknowns caught in battle
2008-08-29
ARLINGTON, Virginia (CNN) -- The Tomb of the Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery is at the center of combat between preservationists and cemetery officials. The giant marble sarcophagus marking the location of unknown U.S. service members has been battling the elements since it opened to the public in 1932. More than 70 years later, it is showing the scars, with cracks encircling it.

The sarcophagus contains the remains of three unknown service members who were killed in World War I, World War II and the Korean War. The remains of a fourth service member, who died during the Vietnam War, were removed from the tomb and identified in 1998.

On its most famous inscription -- "Here rests in honored glory an American soldier known but to God" -- a crack cuts diagonally across the words. Those scars are at the center of a debate: Should the memorial be fixed or replaced with a replica?

"The overall appearance of the memorial is not what it should be and we know this is a problem," said John C. Metzler Jr., the superintendent of Arlington National Cemetery.

As the cracks worsen, cemetery officials say, the threat of a degraded monument will detract from the dignity and respect afforded to those buried at what many consider the nation's most sacred site. They would like an exact replica made with similar marble.

Historical preservationists say it should not be replaced and that the cracks should simply be fixed as needed. "A replica is not the same thing as the original," said John Hildreth of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, a leading historical preservation organization.

Located high on a hill overlooking Washington on the Virginia side of the Potomac River, the Tomb of the Unknowns is diligently looked after by the U.S. military's ceremonial Old Guard 24 hours a day. Cemetery officials estimate more than 4 million people visit the cemetery and the Tomb of the Unknowns every year, making it one of the most popular destinations in the Washington area.

Since the early 1960s, the marble walls that make up the main monument at the Tomb have been developing fissures from natural cracking, made worse by Washington's brutal quick freezes and thaws. The cracks have been slowly growing each year, threatening the look and delicate carvings on the front of the structure rarely seen by the public. The monument has undergone two repairs, one in 1975 and the last one in 1989, with grout used as filler. Since then, other significant cracks have appeared."The cracks continue to grow. And I can't predict what the weather is going to continue to do to the monument," Metzler said.

For years, Arlington National Cemetery, which falls under the control of the Department of the Army, has been looking to replace the 48-ton monument and its fault lines with one that is virtually identical. Metzler says following the rules of the National Historic Preservation Act and locating unblemished marble that will hold up to the weather has slowed the replacement process.

The possibility of replacement -- which the cemetery said would not disturb the actual tombs encasing the remains -- has outraged preservationists. Hildreth's group, the Washington-based National Trust for Historic Preservation, and its allies successfully lobbied Congress to force the cemetery to examine all repair options."Cemetery officials heard our concerns and were not very receptive to changing their plans," Hildreth said. "If they were to replace the monument with the same marble material, it would eventually start cracking again."

Metzler and cemetery officials reported back to Congress this month and decided to continue to repair the cracks as needed -- but will still pursue replacing the monument entirely, if requirements to the National Historic Preservation Act can be met."For now, we will intermittently repair the monument with grouting process that should hold for several years at a time," Metzler told CNN.

The report said cemetery officials believe the "cracks cannot be repaired indefinitely without the monument acquiring a patched, worn and shabby appearance, which is the antithesis of its purpose and contrary to [Arlington National Cemetery's] mission of maintaining a dignified, fitting memorial to our country's fallen soldiers." Metzler said it is impossible to say when or if the memorial would be replaced because it hinges on whether all of the criteria are met in the Preservation Act.

The National Trust contends that the cost of repairing it far outweighs the cost replacing the structure. The cemetery's report to Congress lists a replacement and related costs could total $2.2 million, while the cost for a one-time repair would be about $65,000.
I for one don't care what it costs. Just do it right.
Posted by:tu3031

#7  National Historic Site requirements trigger Sec'ty of Interior Section 106 regs (from one who sadly knows). These are not project-stops, just uber-hurdles that have to be overcome while listening (or pretending...) to everyone from concerned intelligent citizen to fricken' street trash, I mean "urban activists". Good luck
Posted by: Frank G   2008-08-29 18:22  

#6  I thought this was settled over five years ago, but I obviously underestimated the foot dragging talents of the Washington Bureaucracy. Maybe they're waiting for the Yule Quarry to close again so they won't have to decide.

...(In 2002), John Haines, a retired Chevrolet dealer from Glenwood Springs, Colorado, was thumbing through his hometown newspaper when an article about a local business caught his attention.

Arlington National Cemetery's largest and most famous monument, the Tomb of the Unknowns, had developed extensive cracks after seven decades of exposure to harsh winters. At the government's request, Yule Marble Quarry in nearby Marble, Colorado, which had supplied the original white gold-veined marble for the sarcophagus, was searching for a 55-ton stone to replace the cracked one.

Haines, who never served in the military and has never even visited the cemetery, decided that he would like to pay for the new stone. It would, he said, honor those who "have given their lives for our freedom."

A large block of replacement marble has been quarried and $70,000 set aside to pay for it, Haines said recently. But even though the U.S. Army accepted his donation offer in 2002, it is not clear if the stone or his money will ever be used.

Things stalled, in part because a fundamental question has not yet been answered: Should the cracked stone be replaced?

Some argue that it is more respectful to let nature take its course on the tomb, which marks the graves of three never-identified soldiers from World Wars I and II and the Korean War. (An unknown soldier interred from the Vietnam War eventually was identified.)

Other issues, including a mandatory government bidding process and requirements imposed by the 1966 Historic Preservation Act, have turned what Haines thought would be a simple act of generosity into a source of frustration.

The final call is up to cemetery officials, who are deciding among four options: replace the stone, repair it, repair the tomb while procuring a replacement stone, or do nothing.

During July and August they have been accepting suggestions from the public on what should be done. So far, at least one organization and 249 individuals have offered comments.

Large cracks in the memorial, dedicated in November 1932, were first recorded in 1963. The horizontal fissures, then spanning a total of 34 feet, are now more than 10 feet longer and wrap all the way around the tomb's midsection. The lines cut through the shoulders of the three Greek figures (representing Valor, Victory and Peace) adorning the east wall of the block and run diagonally across the words inscribed on the west: "Here rests in honored glory an American soldier known but to God."

Cemetery superintendent John Metzler said that hairline cracks probably formed when the marble was quarried -- at that time, quarry workers did not have the diamond-cut saws now in use -- and were deepened by the freezing and thawing of moisture over the decades.

A 1990 report by Oehrlein & Associates, a Washington architectural firm that specializes in historic preservation, concluded that the cracks will keep lengthening and widening, becoming continuous throughout the stone by 2010.

Because of the tomb's historic and cultural significance, the cemetery is required to seek comments from the public before making a decision.


While searching for the above information I ran across these links which may be of interest to some of you:
Source


The Quartermaster Review Jan-Feb 1932
Details of the construction of the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier
AFTER a period of over two years, the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier is now in its final stage of completion, and is rapidly approaching the form in which it will endure through the ages. Maybe.
Tomb of the Unknowns
Posted by: GK   2008-08-29 17:04  

#5  The government found or borrowed the money to build THIS colossus. FIX IT and NOW!
Posted by: Besoeker   2008-08-29 15:12  

#4  "A replica is not the same thing as the original,"

I'm sure the 'elites' back in London thought the same thing when their American cousins took up the game.

America is a country of the future, not the past. Respect the past, but do not allow it to deny you a better future.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-08-29 15:08  

#3  They made it of marble? That was stupid. Marble is fine in a hot climate without acid rain, say pre-Industrial Revolution Rome. The idiots should have made it out of granite originally. Short term, enclose the thing. Then decide whether or not to replace it with something in the same design but an appropriate material. Or a different design -- 1932 isn't exactly antiquity, and it's a tomb, not a holy relic.
Posted by: trailing wife   2008-08-29 15:05  

#2  Put a building around it, a roof over it, to stabilize temperature shifts and keep it out of the weather. Make the building a nice one, but plan on replacing it when it deteriorates.

Problem solved.
Posted by: Fred   2008-08-29 14:26  

#1  Make a new one, put the old one in a museum and call it a fucking day.
Those men laid to rest deserve more than a dick waving contest by bureaucrats. And as tu said, we don't care what it costs, just get it done right.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-08-29 12:47  

00:00