You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
UK empowers Islamic courts
2008-09-14
Britain is lost.
LONDON: Five Sharia courts have been set up in different cities of Britain with powers to rule on Muslim civil cases.

The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence, according to a report. The Islamic courts have been set up in London, Birmingham, Bradford and Manchester with the network's headquarters in Nuneaton, Warwickshire. Two more courts are being planned for Glasgow and Edinburgh, the report said.

Rulings issued by the five sharia courts are enforceable with full power of the judicial system through the country courts or high court. Previously, the rulings of sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and depended on voluntary compliance among Muslims. Sheikh Faiz-ul-Aqtab Siddique, whose Muslim Arbitration Tribunal runs the courts, said he had taken advantage of a clause in the Arbitration Act 1996.

Under the act, the sharia courts are classified as arbitration tribunals. The rulings of arbitration tribunals are binding in law, provided that both parties in the dispute agree to give it the power to rule on their case.

"We realised that under the 'Arbitration Act', we can make rulings which can be enforced by country and high courts. The act allows disputes to be resolved using alternatives like tribunals," Siddique said. "This method is called alternative dispute resolution, which for Muslims is what the sharia courts are," he said.
Posted by:john frum

#6  There'll have to be a few steps yet before they get to stone anybody. At the moment both parties have to agree to "arbitration," and agreement might not be forthcoming from a stoning candidate.

They need some kind of ruling that being a Muhammadan automatically means agreeing to "arbitration," and then there'll have to be some rule about which Sharia school gets to run them, and then there'll have to be some kind of EU waiver allowing Muhammadan executions.

The first ruling may not take very long. Agreement from the masters in Brussels might take a little longer: the only item of faith left to unite the EU seem to be that capital punishment is almost as bad as the USA.
Posted by: James   2008-09-14 17:51  

#5  Loopholes in the law can be closed.
Posted by: ed   2008-09-14 17:44  

#4  I've always suspected that my ancestors left there for a good reason.
Posted by: Darrell   2008-09-14 16:59  

#3  Sh.t eating surrendering monkeys.
Posted by: JFM   2008-09-14 16:56  

#2  I wonder when they will have their first stoning.
Posted by: Betty Grating2215   2008-09-14 16:38  

#1  Very sad. It was a good run for 400 years. Hard to believe I could have lived through Churchill's funeral to see this. Sad. We should open the immigration gates again.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-09-14 16:35  

00:00