You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Freddie Mac & Fannie Mae profits 'illusions' - McCain, May 25, 2006
2008-09-17
Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005

John McCain joined Charles Hagel, Elizabeth Dole and John Sununu as a co-sponsor of this bill. It was killed by the Donks along with some help by some good-old-boy Trunks. In the meantime, the Obamesiah was second to only Christopher Dodd in the amount of campaign contributions received from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

It will be interesting to see how Mac puts this up Obama's gluteus maximus in the upcoming debate. I can't wait. Get out the popcorn machine.


John McCain from the Congressional Record, May 25 2006
Mr. President, this week Fannie Mae's regulator reported that the company's quarterly reports of profit growth over the past few years were "illusions deliberately and systematically created" by the company's senior management, which resulted in a $10.6 billion accounting scandal.

The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight's report goes on to say that Fannie Mae employees deliberately and intentionally manipulated financial reports to hit earnings targets in order to trigger bonuses for senior executives. In the case of Franklin Raines, Fannie Mae's former chief executive officer, OFHEO's report shows that over half of Mr. Raines' compensation for the 6 years through 2003 was directly tied to meeting earnings targets. The report of financial misconduct at Fannie Mae echoes the deeply troubling $5 billion profit restatement at Freddie Mac.

The OFHEO report also states that Fannie Mae used its political power to lobby Congress in an effort to interfere with the regulator's examination of the company's accounting problems. This report comes some weeks after Freddie Mac paid a record $3.8 million fine in a settlement with the Federal Election Commission and restated lobbying disclosure reports from 2004 to 2005. These are entities that have demonstrated over and over again that they are deeply in need of reform.

For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac--known as Government-sponsored entities or GSEs--and the sheer magnitude of these companies and the role they play in the housing market. OFHEO's report this week does nothing to ease these concerns. In fact, the report does quite the contrary. OFHEO's report solidifies my view that the GSEs need to be reformed without delay.

I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.

I urge my colleagues to support swift action on this GSE reform legislation
Quick Info
S. 190 [109th]: Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005
Last Action: Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Status: Dead


Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#11  I expect to get boilerplate and platitudes back from them;

I would be extremely surprised if you got ANYTHING AT ALL back, they want to ignore it as hard as they can, and answering questions is NOT ignoring.

Their plan is to not answer (Do NOT Provide Any info or confirmation to your fears) and shortly they'll have another Flashy/shiny thing to distract you with.

OOOH look, fireworks, Vote O'Bambi into ofice, help make history.
What did you say? Mor what? Cri what? Can't hear you over all the cheering.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-09-17 20:18  

#10  In #7 above you will notice the Donk's leadership is on the top 12 Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac campaign fund recipients list.

If you expand the list to the top 20, you can add Nancy Pelosi at #18.
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2008-09-17 18:06  

#9  Well, I have just written my love letter to our worthy Senators Kohl and Feingold, telling them just what the housing crunch has done to my neighborhood (I can see three houses facing foreclosure from my front and back doors). I have reminded them of the political malfeasance behind Fannie and Freddie and challenged them to call for a special prosecutor to examine this mess. I expect to get boilerplate and platitudes back from them; but you never know.
Posted by: mom    2008-09-17 16:46  

#8  The way to get this out where the MSM has to cover it is if Sarah starts talking about it. For a time, at least, she can set the agenda any way she wishes. Fighting corruption is her claim to fame.She has plenty of entry points on this. I hope she goes for it.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2008-09-17 12:32  

#7  Top 12 recipients of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac campaign funds:

Dodd, Christopher $165,400 (Chair Banking Comm.)
Obama, Barack $126,349
Kerry, John $111,000
Bennett, Robert $107,999
Bachus, Spencer $103,300
Blunt, Roy $96,950
Kanjorski, Paul $96,000
Bond, Christopher $95,400
Shelby, Richard $80,000
Reed, Jack $78,250
Reid, Harry $77,000
Clinton, Hillary $76,050
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2008-09-17 12:03  

#6  The story, presented THIS way, will never appear in the MSM. The topic is not likely to come up in the debates in a way that would allow McCain to point out O'Bambi's failings.
Posted by: Glenmore   2008-09-17 10:10  

#5  I would go on the offensive on this. Taxpayers already know they will take it up the a$$ on this bailout and are getting pissed. Showing McCain tried to prevent it, and Bambi was one of Fannie's biggest receivers of money will cut a couple more points off Bambi's tanking numbers.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-09-17 09:56  

#4  Franklin Raines is one of 0bama's finance advisors.
Posted by: Grenter, Protector of the Geats   2008-09-17 09:36  

#3  Mike N.--I disagree. The margin was slim in the Senate in 2006. Take an indepth look at the actual members who killed the bill and I believe you will find that the majority of naysayers were the Donks and therefore the good intentioned Trunks could not succeed.
Posted by: Slolulet Turkeyneck1341   2008-09-17 09:08  

#2  Gonna be hard for McCain to stuff this one up the donks ass. By reading the article, it looks like it was submitted in '05 (when trunks had the majority) and never got out of committee.
Posted by: Mike N.   2008-09-17 03:19  

#1  #2 in slush from Fan 'n' Fred, 1989-2008: the junior Senator from Illinois, with $126k-- even though he'd been in office only 2 years...

Wonder how much Jim Jordan gave Barack? Will Jordan disgorge his ill-gotten gains?
Posted by: tep   2008-09-17 02:05  

00:00