You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Can America - legally - attack Iran?
2008-09-26
Posted by:ryuge

#10  LOW-PROFILE HAPPY IRAN desires to keep things that way, at least vee ISRAEL, IRAQ, + AFGHANISTAN-PAKIS, and is likely doing everything to make sure the MILITANTS-TERRS don't do anything to validate US, ISRAELI, and or UNSC MILACTION AGZ IT.

THE REST OF ASIA, ETC., IS ANOTHER AND SEPARATE MATTER, as the Militant-Terr Gruppes are rampaging and waging Jihad far and wide. Methinks its safe to argue that, at least for the duration of the natural lifetimes of OSAMA BIN LADEN, ZAWI, MULLAH OMAR, NASRALLAH, SADR, and OTHER CONTEMPOR TOP ISLAMIST LEADERS, THE "MUSLIM/ISLAMIC CONQUEST OF MAINLAND ASIA" + ANY PERIPHERALS/LITTORAL ENCLAVES WILL BE THE PRIORITY FOR JIHAD, AS PER IN PARALLEL WID NUCLEARIZATION.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-09-26 19:47  

#9  Don't have to send Vulcans halfway across the world nowadays.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2008-09-26 17:44  

#8  Few know that Biden was the original source for Senator John Blutarski.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-09-26 15:19  

#7  Did any of you read the article? It's a bunch of blather about whether or not the U.S. should be allowed to use British bases. Hey, Brits: we can let loose one hell of a cruise missile barrage without any landing rights at your bases!
Posted by: Darrell   2008-09-26 12:37  

#6  If Sudan can skirt the law, I think we're cool.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-09-26 11:19  

#5  Blutto, stop stealing Biden's lines.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2008-09-26 11:11  

#4  Did the Germans have legal authority to bomb Pearl Harbor?
Posted by: Blutto   2008-09-26 11:08  

#3  Not as long as George/Condi hold the roost.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2008-09-26 10:59  

#2  Did Russia have legal authority to attack Georgia?

Since the world has been rather mute on the subject, I think we have an answer. It's an internal question for the US [the only power on the planet with the means and a modicum of will] rather than a linguistics and semantics game.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-09-26 08:39  

#1  There is no international law because unelected bodies have no authority to make laws.
Posted by: JFM   2008-09-26 08:16  

00:00