You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran solves centrifuge issues, could have nuke capability by March
2008-09-27
WASHINGTON -- Iran has significantly enhanced its gas centrifuge fleet, despite mass cases of western denial assertions to the contrary, according to a new report.

The Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security stated that Teheran has resolved many of the technical flaws in its 4,000 centrifuges being used in Iran's uranium enrichment program. The institute, headed by former United Nations nuclear inspector David Albright, said Teheran was enriching uranium at a rate that would enable nuclear weapons capacity by March 2009.

"The centrifuges now appear to be running at approximately 85 percent of their stated target capacity, a significant increase over previous rates," the report said.

The report, released on Sept. 15, was based on information by the International Atomic Energy Agency. In early 2008, the agency indicated that Iran was operating its centrifuge fleet at 50 percent capacity.

Titled "Centrifuge Operation Significantly Improving," the U.S. institute said Iran has now intensified uranium enrichment. The institute cited an IAEA finding that from May 7 to Aug. 30, 2008, Iran fed 3,630 kilograms of uranium hexafluoride into the cascades at the Natanz plant, "a significant increase over previous rates."

"Whatever the actual amount of LEU [low-enriched uranium], Iran is progressing toward this [nuclear weapons] capability and can be expected to reach it in six months to two years," the report said.

The institute's assessment appeared to differ with that of IAEA. On Sept. 15, an agency briefer told the board of governors that Iran was operating much of its centrifuge fleet at 20 percent capacity.

But Albright, along with report co-authors Jacqueline Shire and Paul Brannan, determined that Iran has overcome difficulties in operating its P-1 centrifuge cascades. The researchers said that until mid-2008 Iran lost a significant amount of uranium because of breakdowns in Pakistani-designed P-1 centrifuges.

"This latest [IAEA] report, however, shows that Iran has largely overcome these problems, which is reflected in the increased feed rates and LEU production," the institute said. "One official close to the agency stated that Iran may have reached a point where its cascades are operating in a stable manner, noting that fewer centrifuges are breaking."

The institute said Iran has assembled 18 cascades that comprise 3,000 P-1 centrifuges. At the same time, Iran was installing a second module of 3,000 centrifuges.

Iran has also been accelerating tests of its advanced IR-2 centrifuge. The institute said Iran has installed two or three models of what was termed "next-generation" centrifuges, including IR-2, IR-3 and "possibly a longer centrifuge."

"During this reporting [May to August 2008] period, Iran has significantly increased the feed rate into its IR-2 centrifuges," the report said. "This development appears to reflect Iran's goal of developing a more advanced centrifuge that can be deployed in the FEP [fuel enrichment plant] instead of its P1 centrifuges. It is unknown how long Iran intends to test these new designs or when they could be deployed in large numbers in the underground halls."
Posted by:Alaska Paul

#8  trailing wife: actually yes. Since Israel can both act on its own, and has sufficient nuclear weaponry to take out most of the Muslim world, the US would have to spend a substantial amount of time convincing the Israelis that the numbers don't lie.

I know that we have intensively worked with them both on the ARROW and THAAD systems, and also keep them abreast of our laser work. Their boffins can do the math as well. America has spent decades refining overkill theory for just such reasons.

And the bottom line is even if we are wrong, it changes nothing. Israel still has full retaliatory capability, and understands that sooner or later it will be the target.

So the one big question still remaining is who will be elected US president. If it is McCain, the Iranians had best be prepared to have the poop kicked out of them.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-09-27 22:18  

#7  That's where the Somali pirates come to play. Little do they know they have been working for the Great Satan all this time.
Posted by: ed   2008-09-27 15:18  

#6  Those airborne lasers should also be a real plus when it comes to stopping an unmarked cargo container on its way to the port of New York City.
Posted by: Excalibur   2008-09-27 13:58  

#5  That's very comforting, Anonymoose, but does that mean Israel no longer need worry about a single missile getting through and killing one sixth of her population?
Posted by: trailing wife   2008-09-27 13:40  

#4  I have pretty well reached the conclusion that the US is very relaxed about this whole deal for a very good reason: our 300+ anti-missile missiles in the region are no longer the first line of defense.

That is, we have fielded several effective airborne anti-missile lasers, as well as AESA radar that can effectively jam missile and warhead electronics.

Together, it has raised the overkill ratio that Iran would have to accomplish to so far beyond their capabilities that only a fraction of a percent of their missiles have a chance of even leaving Iranian airspace.

Add this to other weapons systems like conventional cruise missiles and multiple independently targeted SDBs dropped from a high altitude bomber, heavily degrading their capability, and Iran's offensive ability is reduced to zero.

From that point, the US could systematically eliminate any medium or high altitude AAA threat, then use bunker busters to eliminate every known underground installation.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-09-27 10:58  

#3  Shouldn't the EUROpeons be somewhat concerned about this? After all, they are the ones that will have this madman in their back yard.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-09-27 09:10  

#2  Don't bother US, we're busy now.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2008-09-27 08:00  

#1  ION KOMMERSANT > RUSSIA HAS ENOUGH URANIUM FOR 60 YEARS. Milyuhns and Zilyuhns of MARVIN MARTIAN'S ANTI-US PU-286 EXPLOSIVE SPACE MODULATOR-R-R-S are NOT at risk???

Yet anuther reason, Virginia, as to why the NEW US-ISLAMIST WAR FOR CONTROL OF THE ASIAN MAINLAND,
aka the "8-8-8" RUSSO-GEORGIAN CONFLICT-WAR.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-09-27 00:45  

00:00