| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Comparison of original Paulson bailout to compromise proposal |
| 2008-09-28 |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #4 Agreed, the voters need to have the option of retribution at the ballot box. Whoever is President should have to defend his actions up to that point in responding to the fiscal mess. Three years would be good. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2008-09-28 19:40 |
| #3 5 year review time is too long. It will be within the next presidential term. It needs to be before the next election. 3 years. |
| Posted by: 3dc 2008-09-28 19:19 |
| #2 It is not you Lollypop, these government folks are still using double-speak of financese and governmentese language. Part of the same problem we got into with the "invented" investment instruments that ended up having no value. Which resulted in a few getting very rich by trading worthless paper for worthless paper and then leaving after the company started into a downward spiral. Wall Street and Washington weasels. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2008-09-28 15:52 |
| #1 I'm not sure what all that means, but at least the giveaways to the democrat political machine have been removed from the bill. Does Pelosi know this ? She will never go along without a dollup of democrat corruption to smooth out the voting. Don't these donkeys know that we are watching them ? |
| Posted by: lollypop 2008-09-28 13:17 |