You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
B.O. wants regional Afghan strategy: report
2008-11-12
President-elect Barack Obama's incoming administration is considering a regional strategy to the war in Afghanistan that could include talks with Iran, the Washington Post reported Tuesday.

The newspaper, citing unnamed Obama national security advisers, also said the incoming officials support talks between the Afghan government of Hamid Karzai and "reconcilable" members of the Taliban.
Do American newspapers ever again intend to name a source?
Once he takes over as president of the United States on Jan. 20, Obama intends to renew the U.S. focus on hunting down Osama bin Laden, responsible for the deadly Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the U.S., the Obama advisers told the Post. They said this will be a priority for the new administration and that the president-elect believes President Bush has played down after years of failing to apprehend the al-Qaeda leader.

The newspaper reported that several Obama advisors and senior military strategists share the opinion that the administration of George W. Bush "has been hampered by ideological and diplomatic constraints and an unrealistic commitment to the goal of building a modern democracy" in Afghanistan.

A more realistic goal would be to help build a stable Afghanistan that rejects Islamist extremism and does not threaten U.S. interests, the officials told the Post. None of the Obama advisers or the military strategists would speak openly, "citing sensitivities surrounding the presidential transition and the war itself," the Post said.
Posted by:Fred

#6  How come when I saw this picture, i first thought it was an update of the "Oh geez, not this shit again" graphic?????
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-11-12 14:48  

#5  several Obama advisors and senior military strategists share the opinion that the administration of George W. Bush "has been hampered by ideological and diplomatic constraints and an unrealistic commitment to the goal of building a modern democracy" in Afghanistan.

The Party is much more comfortable with dictators than democracies. Ignorant third world serfs need to be led by their betters.
Posted by: DoDo   2008-11-12 11:17  

#4  This "regional strategy" stuff sounds sophisticated, but it's really, really stupid, especially the "talking with Iran" part. Besides, I've seen it all before - newly elected Democrat presidents coming up with some lame policy just to contrast themselves with the former Repub president.
Posted by: me myself and I   2008-11-12 06:32  

#3  Everything old is new again. As long as you spin it just right so that everyone's memory doesn't make the connection.
Posted by: gorb   2008-11-12 05:20  

#2  George W. Bush "has been hampered by ideological and diplomatic constraints and an unrealistic commitment to the goal of building a modern democracy" in Afghanistan

Gee. That's funny. I heard W mention as soon as all this started and on several occasions afterwards that the intention was to install a democracy, but that we shouldn't expect it to look like what we're used to. I guess I don't understand English as well as I thought.
Posted by: gorb   2008-11-12 05:19  

#1  A chance to send Secretary of State John F Kerry to Kabul. No doubt his charm will pacify all the violent elements in Iran and Pakistan.

At least he will have the hat.
Posted by: mhw   2008-11-12 01:00  

00:00