You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
'Kill Ahmadinejad, halt Iran's N-drive'
2008-11-24
A former Israeli commander says the West must consider assassinating Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to halt Tehran's nuclear program.

Former Israeli Army Chief of Staff Moshe "Boogie" Ya'alon told the Australian daily The Sydney Morning Herald that the West should consider all options to stop the Islamic Republic's nuclear drive, Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported on Sunday. "We have to confront the Iranian revolution immediately," Ya'alon said. "There is no way to stabilize the Middle East today without defeating the Iranian regime. The Iranian nuclear program must be stopped."

"We have to consider killing him (President Ahmadinejad). All options must be considered," the Israeli official added. He claimed that Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the Persian Gulf littoral states would welcome any military strike against Iran.

Ya'alon said that he had been surprised when the US decided to go into Iraq instead of Iran in 2003.

Ya'alon had declared that he would join the hardliner Likud Party's list to participate in the faction's primaries.
Posted by:Fred

#14  them waking up caused a holy war
Posted by: chris   2008-11-24 13:17  

#13  Wait for a big government meeting then send the F-22's with JDAMs.
Posted by: Hellfish   2008-11-24 12:30  

#12  I agree with Uleck Ghibelline9225. Take out the leadership. Let them try to take out ours if they can. We have a plan for orderly transition of power and dictatorships, even with shame democratic fronts, rarely do.

Also they would likely cause a Holy War if they tried to kill "The One"
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-11-24 11:11  

#11  Wouldn't that be loverly? Anyway, what's the downside?
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2008-11-24 10:56  

#10  where's Oswald when you really need him?
Posted by: hammerhead   2008-11-24 09:38  

#9  I concur w/OS in that they would find another dufus to be their mouth piece. I'm still not opposed to killing the monkey anyway. I think we should be working over time to wet-work all these *ssholes. Chavez, Castro, Kim Jong-Il, etc.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2008-11-24 08:18  

#8  I have to agree with him that Iran has and is a bigger problem than Iraq ever was!!!!
Posted by: Paul2   2008-11-24 07:19  

#7  Not what Yaalon said according to JPost. On the other hand, bringing personal responsibility into the life of Dictators...
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2008-11-24 07:11  

#6  OS may be right (#1) about the long term effects, but that doesn't mean doing it wouldn't be fun.
Posted by: SteveS   2008-11-24 07:06  

#5  Nutjob's just a diversion. Nuke the government and the problem will go away.
Posted by: gorb   2008-11-24 06:22  

#4  "BOOGIE OOGIE" [song]??? YA-'ALON > D *** NG IT, IRAN's GOTTA "BOOGIE NO MORE, BOOGIE NO MORE.... COME AND FEEL THE BEAT, YEAH"!?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-11-24 02:01  

#3  I think killing elites are one of advantages that democracies have over dicatorships. This means less innocent civilians killed.
Posted by: Uleck Ghibelline9225   2008-11-24 00:57  

#2  One Ayatollah (Khamenei) and the IRGC actually matter here.
Posted by: Pappy   2008-11-24 00:21  

#1  Sorry, problem goes deeper than that. The Ayatollahs will find another rube if you get rid of the current one.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-11-24 00:04  

00:00