You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
'Pakistan mulls downing US drones'
2008-12-05
Pakistani officials are urging the incoming Obama administration to stop air attacks on Pakistani territory and are even hinting that they might shoot down US drones in its airspace, according to a report published in the Washington Times (WT).

The report said US forces based in Afghanistan had carried out around 25 strikes this year, most of them by drones, in the Pakistani border region. However, a November 19 attack was carried out in Bannu beyond the Tribal Areas, in the settled areas of Pakistan. After the strike on NWFP's Bannu district, the government summoned US Ambassador to Pakistan Anne W Patterson to the Foreign Ministry and lodged a formal protest.

Foreign Office spokesman Muhammad Sadiq said the US ambassador was told that the attacks violated Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Pakistani officials have publicly discussed a military option. Air Chief Marshal Tanvir Mahmood Ahmed said last week that if the government decided to shoot down the pilotless aircraft, the military was fully capable of intercepting them. "The air force is ready for any type of air defence," the air chief marshal was quoted by Reuters news agency as saying.

On September 23, a drone crashed inside Pakistani territory near Angoor Ada in South Waziristan Agency. The Pakistan Army said the drone crashed because of a technical malfunction. However, residents in Angoor Ada claimed they shot down the drone.

US officials have told the Washington Times that Pakistan has given tacit approval for attacks that are confined to the Tribal Areas and do not involve US ground forces. A Pakistani official, who asked not to be named, said "these are very sensitive matters" and that the target had to be "a very important asset" to justify an attack.

In public, Pakistani officials vehemently deny any bargain with Washington.
Posted by:Fred

#9  Yeah, well, good luck with that, guys.
Posted by: mojo   2008-12-05 12:55  

#8  Doesn't Wakiland have much more pressing problems to deal with?
Like their economy?
Barbarians at the gates?
A very pissed off India?
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-12-05 11:33  

#7  US mulls flying F-15s between Afghanistan and India

Mull rolling M1A2s instead.
Posted by: JFM   2008-12-05 10:28  

#6  I'm mulling having sex with Selma Hayek.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-12-05 10:12  

#5  US mulls flying F-15s between Afghanistan and India.
Posted by: ed   2008-12-05 07:13  

#4  "Pakistan mulls downing US drones national suicide"

There, fixed it. Shooting at US military assets would be an act of war. Don't even think about it.*

*warning may not apply during Obama administration.
Posted by: Baba Tutu   2008-12-05 04:27  

#3  Further:

"said the US ambassador was told that the attacks violated Pakistan's sovereignty "

The US reply should be:

When you can ACT as a sovereign nation and control activity within your borders to keep it from spilling over, then we will treat you as a sovereign nation. Until such time, you are neither fit for the term, nor deserving of an consideration on those grounds. You are merely an agglomeration of tribes, and will be treated as such.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-12-05 03:16  

#2  THey need to be more concerned with taking out the terrorists we have to send the drones to hit.

Were they doing their job, our UAV/UCAV would not be in their airspace.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-12-05 03:14  

#1  Let's test their word...
Take out Khan!
Posted by: 3dc   2008-12-05 00:23  

00:00