You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Ballot Madness: Tipping the Scales in Minnesota's Senate Recount
2008-12-22
The Canvassing Board overseeing the vote recount for MinnesotaÂ’s tightly contested U.S. Senate race isnÂ’t quite done examining disputed ballots, but the board issued a projection Saturday night that Al Franken will pick up 270 votes when it finishes. Currently the board is determining voter intent in disputed ballots. If the projection proves correct, Franken will beat incumbent Sen. Norm Coleman by 78 votes.

Vote totals have changed a lot since Nov. 4, when Coleman led Franken by 725 votes. Correcting typos cut ColemanÂ’s margin to 215, and a recount by all the counties reduced it further to 192. Yet, the additional 270 votes picked up by Franken from the Canvassing BoardÂ’s decisions have been among the most controversial.

The vote pickup has occurred through two actions by the board — divining voter intent and determining what votes should be counted. While decisions to include missing or overlooked ballots have gotten the most attention, the process of determining intent has also been important in determining the outcome here.

The Canvassing Board faces a difficult task in divining voter intentions. It is very difficult to determine how a voter meant to vote simply by looking at what might be stray marks on the ballot. And whatever rules are adopted must be consistently used in evaluating all ballots.

Some board decisions on votes are exceedingly difficult to understand, and even watching the television coverage of their decisions this last week provided little additional insight. Here is an example where the Minnesota Canvassing Board claims the vote is clearly for Franken. Voters are supposed to fill in the small oval next to a candidateÂ’s name to vote for that candidate. The board explains its decision as there being "No Dup" (presumably meaning that there was no duplicate ballot), but it is not clear how that would switch what looks like an obvious Coleman vote to a Franken vote.

Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#7  How is it possible that we have these issues 8 years after Florida.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-12-22 22:34  

#6  Unfortunately, the precedent for aggressive challenges and re-challenges was set in the early 90s (and before that, in party situations) by Karl Rove. Hard to argue it's an invalid tactic now that the other side is wielding it.
Posted by: lotp   2008-12-22 22:19  

#5  Face it guys, they're going to keep counting them until Franken wins.
They'll count them a thousand times if they have to.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-12-22 21:52  

#4  Here is an example where the Minnesota Canvassing Board claims the vote is clearly for Franken.



Posted by: ed   2008-12-22 18:00  

#3  Yet another instance of 'Keep Recounting until the Democrat Wins'....
Posted by: CrazyFool   2008-12-22 17:33  

#2  more like "thumb on the scales"
Posted by: Clusorong Wittlesbach7244   2008-12-22 17:12  

#1  "And whatever rules are adopted must be consistently used in evaluating all ballots."

Not where the Dems are involved.... >:-(
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-12-22 16:22  

00:00