Submit your comments on this article | |||
Home Front: WoT | |||
US: Muslims object to terror plot verdict | |||
2008-12-24 | |||
(AKI) - Muslim leaders have objected to a US court decision to convict five Muslims for plotting a terror attack on an American military base at Fort Dix in the state of New Jersey.
The jury, however, acquitted the group of charges of attempted murder. Mohamad Younes, president of the American Muslim Union, questioned the jury's decision. "I don't think they actually mean to do anything," he said. "I think they were acting stupid, like they thought the whole thing was a joke."
Defence lawyers had argued that the five were just bragging about their plans and also challenged the credibility of the government informants. One Egyptian-born informant was paid 230,000 dollars by the FBI for his undercover work, said the defence lawyers. They also said he was on probation for bank fraud. Defence lawyers also claimed that the men were coaxed by the government informants into making controversial and incendiary remarks which were recorded. However, police discovered propaganda material, maps, hundreds of secretly taped conversations and video material. Dritan and Shain Duka were also found guilty of possessing weapons to be used in the planned attack that was never executed. Sentencing has been set for April 2009 and acting US Attorney Ralph Marra said prosecutors will demand a life sentence without the possibility of parole. Defence lawyers said they would consider an appeal after hearing the sentence. | |||
Posted by:Fred |
#9 "Muslim leaders have objected to a US court decision to convict five Muslims for plotting a terror attack" Of course they do. In other breaking news, water is wet. |
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2008-12-24 19:03 |
#8 I still don't understand why they weren't cut loose to do the deed, then cut down at the gate. |
Posted by: Last Breath Farm Resident 2008-12-24 16:04 |
#7 "Defence lawyers said they would consider an appeal after hearing the sentence." Isn't the purpose of an appeal only to consider whether the law is applied / interpreted correctly? So if no procedural errors are uncovered, the verdict stands, right? |
Posted by: USN, Ret. 2008-12-24 12:42 |
#6 if they don't like it they can all move too sucj paradises on earth such as pakistan, afghanitstan yemen saudi arabia or so on and not be able too co0me back. bet they would shut up then. and don't worry obama will pardon them in 4 years anyway |
Posted by: rabid whitetail 2008-12-24 11:43 |
#5 Well the US Muslims haven't started threatening to execute the jury. Yet. |
Posted by: mhw 2008-12-24 10:47 |
#4 |
Posted by: William Marcy Tweed 2008-12-24 10:14 |
#3 They might not have actually done the planned assault and killings if they had not been arrested but that was not required for the conspiracy charge (I could see the jury's position on the attempted murder charge though.) They might not have actually actively planned the conspiracy if they had not been incited/inspired by the FBI informants (whom I did not and do not trust as witnesses), but since they proved that they COULD be inspired to plan an assault on Americans I figure they would have been inspired/incited sooner or later by some imam or another. Lock 'em up. After all, we lock up little kids with toy cap pistols in school. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2008-12-24 10:06 |
#2 they can FOAD. |
Posted by: 3dc 2008-12-24 01:09 |
#1 Of course they do. They object to anything other than infidels dying. |
Posted by: DarthVader 2008-12-24 00:24 |