You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
U.S. governors seek $1 trillion federal assistance
2009-01-03
Governors of five U.S. states urged the federal government to provide $1 trillion in aid to the country's 50 states to help pay for education, welfare and infrastructure as states struggle with steep budget deficits amid a deepening recession.
I have yet to hear a politician say "we can't afford that."
The governors of New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Ohio and Wisconsin -- all Democrats -- said the initiative for the two-year aid package was backed by other governors and follows a meeting in December where governors called on President-elect Barack Obama to help them maintain services in the face of slumping revenues.

Gov. David Paterson of New York said 43 states now have budget deficits totaling some $100 billion as tax revenues plunge.

"It's clear that the federal government needs to step in and jump-start the economy," said Gov. Deval Patrick of Massachusetts.

The latest package calls for $350 billion to create jobs by building or repairing roads, bridges and other public works; $250 billion to maintain education; and another $250 billion in "counter-cyclical" spending such as extending unemployment benefits and food stamps, which are typically a responsibility of the states. The remainder would be used to fund middle-class tax cuts, stimulate the embattled housing market, and stem the tide of home foreclosures through a loan-modification program.

Gov. Jon Corzine of New Jersey said he hoped some of the $700 billion authorized by Congress in the Troubled Asset Relief Program would be available to help the housing market.

The governors said during a conference call with reporters that the plan had been discussed with Congressional leaders and the incoming administration, which had indicated its willingness to help.

"The Obama team has been very receptive in listening to us," said Gov. Jim Doyle of Wisconsin. He said "quite a number" of other governors back the initiative.

The Republican Governors Association, however, said the level of federal aid being sought would create a burden for the future.

"The proposal by the Democratic governors goes beyond things like 'shovel-ready' infrastructure projects and is essentially a bailout of these states' general funds," Nick Ayers, executive director of the Republican Governors Association, said in a statement. "Now is the time to focus on finding cost-effective ways to provide essential services without burdening future generations with ever greater debt."

Doyle of Wisconsin said the plan would allow states to maintain essential services at about the current level until 2010, when the national economy is expected to begin a recovery.

The proposal comes amid expectations that the Obama administration, which takes office on January 20, will provide hundreds of billions of dollars in economic stimulus to boost the shrinking U.S. economy and halt the loss of jobs.

Paterson of New York said his state's budget deficit has surged to $15.4 billion currently from $5 billion in April 2008, despite a 3.2 percent cut in the education budget.

Corzine said the money called for represents about 3 percent to 3.5 percent of the economy, equivalent to the amount that the economy is expected to contract by over the next two quarters.
Posted by:Fred

#9  Verlaine, I don't know about states asking for bailouts, but I do remember New York City asking the feds for a bailout - in 1975 or so. The headline on the New York Post was "Ford to NYC - drop dead!". Abe Beame, of an unnamed party, was mayor at the time.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2009-01-03 13:26  

#8  So why is it that in the zillion previous economic down cycles - which only anyone over 30 can really remember, so fantastic has the economy been for so long - state govts. never needed federal bailouts? And, ahemm, did these idiots not put away a dime for a rainy day?

Is anyone going to step up and say no to the leeches (public sector "unions")? Sorry, there are many good public employees, but "unionization" is an indefensible sham in this sector, and is literally bankrupting cities, states, and now potentially (and partly) the country.
Posted by: Verlaine   2009-01-03 12:14  

#7  Like the auto bailout this money does not create new jobs, it is just to maintain jobs for politically connected unions.

Who pays for it? Monetizing the debt means that the middle class and foreign creditors will absorb the losses. Senior citizens living on fixed incomes will be hit particularly hard.

It should also be noted that maintaining these uneconomic jobs will prolong the recession, not shorten it. The silver lining of a downturn is the cleaning out of deadwood; bailouts maintain the deadwood at the cost of new growth. Winners will be those who have jobs; losers will be those looking for jobs. The next five years will be a poor time to come out of high school or college.
Posted by: DoDo   2009-01-03 11:38  

#6  they should have handed the states the money before citigroup, AIG , and the automakers and who ever else has gotten money off this sham
Posted by: rabid whitetail   2009-01-03 09:42  

#5  They've played and now they want others to pay because the bill is due and they know a tax revolt in their small 'stan will happen otherwise. Fine. You get the money and revert to territorial status forfeiting your Senators and Representatives in Congress until you get a statehood act passed both at home and ratified in Congress [and before you raise the point about taxing and representation, just look at D.C., nuff said]. Wonder how many governors would buy into that contract?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-01-03 08:43  

#4  Screw the election,
JOE! For Treasury!
Posted by: .5MT   2009-01-03 07:44  

#3  Clearly the only thing better that 2 ea. 100-year USTreas Bonds is MANY = MILYUHNS AND ZILYUHNS AND TILYUHNS, ETC. OF SAME.

Its only $$$ = WEIRDLY COLORED PAPER???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-01-03 01:21  

#2  Who pays the looters? The producers (aka. *you*) do. Who else?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-01-03 00:50  

#1  If everybody gets a bailout, who pays?
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-01-03 00:46  

00:00