You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
NYT: Selling Principles Like A $5 Crack Whore
2009-01-06
In its latest concession to the worst revenue slide since the Depression, The New York Times has begun selling display advertising on its front page, a step that has become increasingly common across the newspaper industry.
"See? We're no worse than the rest of the rabble"
The first such ad, appearing Monday in color, was bought by CBS. The ad, two-and-a-half inches high, lies horizontally across the bottom of the front page, below the news articles and a brief summary of some articles in the paper. In a statement, the paper said such ads would be placed "below the fold" -- that is, on the lower half of the page.
"that speaks to our still relevant standards"
In the past, The Times has printed an occasional front-page classified ad -- two or three lines of text at the bottom of the page. And a few years ago it began selling display ads -- which are much larger and can combine images and text -- on the front pages of sections inside the paper.
"we can do either, or both, for cash. Hey mister, I'll do you good!"
But The Times did not sell displays on the first page of the first section, a move regarded by traditionalists as a commercial incursion into the most important news space in the paper.

Most major American papers sell front-page display ads, including The Wall Street Journal, USA Today and The Los Angeles Times, but some others, including The Washington Post, do not.
*sniff*
The Times would not disclose the rates it charges for ads on the front page. Ordinarily, such space would be coveted by advertisers for its prominence, but it remains to be seen how well it will sell in the current climate, in which ad spending is plummeting.

An ad on a paper's front page "really stands out; it's very attractive," said Beth Fidoten, senior vice president and director of print accounts at Initiative, a media buying firm. Generally, she said, papers do not charge significantly more for that space than for other premium spots, "but the way it's usually done is the advertiser has to make a significant commitment to multiple ads."
The NYT closed at $7.06 today, down from a 52 week high of $21.14, and down from $48.01, four short years ago. Pinch's economic miracle!
Posted by:Frank G

#20  Don't worry the Donks will bail them out as part of Obama's multi-trillion dollar "stimulus".
Posted by: DMFD   2009-01-06 20:23  

#19  Think short hairs, Frank.

Which hopefully the economy has the NYSlimes by....
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-01-06 20:03  

#18  think short sale, Barb
Posted by: Frank G   2009-01-06 18:57  

#17  Don't you have to have principles in order to sell them?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-01-06 18:18  

#16  #'s 13, 14 and 15 nail it perfectly.
Posted by: WolfDog   2009-01-06 16:42  

#15  If we're lucky, maybe Pinchy had all his private monies with his friend Madoff. If so, he's flatter than a dried out cow pattie.
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter 2700   2009-01-06 12:41  

#14  All told, the crack whore has more market appeal.
Posted by: Iblis   2009-01-06 12:10  

#13  Unlike the Times, most crack whores turn a profit...
Posted by: tu3031   2009-01-06 12:09  

#12  Alas, a $5.00 crack whore would not publish classified information about the most effective antiterrorism tactics used since 9/11.

When they published those articles which essentially compromised our ability to successfully monitor and track terrorists, I decided they were worse than Al-Jazerrya...at least AJ makes no bones about their bias.

They cloak themselves in the thin disguise of objective journalism and all they are is a cover to cover op-ed piece with very little balance.

Even their sports writers bash GWB!!! I saw a piece in the "elegant living by diletants" section of the Rag and it was a wall to wall piece of liberal nonsense and anti Republican crap.

The Yellow Press of the 1890's has nothing on the morons and malcontents that "write" for the times....

I wouldn't even wrap my garbage in that waste of newsprint.
Posted by: James Carville   2009-01-06 10:50  

#11  But they do run uncorroborated torture stories.

An Ex-Detainee of the U.S. Describes a 6-Year Ordeal
Posted by: Beavis   2009-01-06 10:41  

#10  Ad specials for the fish market.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2009-01-06 10:25  

#9  I really think they need to put the astrology back on the front page...at least it's more objective than their so-called feature stories.
Posted by: hammerhead   2009-01-06 09:57  

#8  "The NYT hasn't had principles since the 50's"...the 1850's!
Posted by: AlanC   2009-01-06 09:52  

#7  Nothing new here. The NYT hasn't had principles since the 50's.
Posted by: Israel   2009-01-06 09:43  

#6  More ads = less propaganda.
Posted by: ed   2009-01-06 08:09  

#5  What's next? Pie charts?!

/sniffy NYT reader
Posted by: eLarson   2009-01-06 07:46  

#4  As late as the early 1970's, front page ads were commonplace in major newspapers in most large cities. But in those days, we hadn't yet felt the full effects of the class of '68, and capitalism was not perceived of as being 'crass' by most folks. Ads were simply a way of making money. There's nothing wrong with advertising anywhere a paper wants, AFAIC.

Still, imagine the horror of the millions who have convinced themselves that reading 'the Times' every day makes them automatic smart people, better than the rest of us, and above all that evil capitalism. Their consternation is my joy.
Posted by: no mo uro   2009-01-06 06:16  

#3  NYT: Selling Principles Like A $5 Crack Whore

Not really. Crack whores still have some principles left to sell, and even then there are some things even a crack whore wouldn't do.
Posted by: gorb   2009-01-06 03:25  

#2  "Selling Principles Like A $5 Crack Whore"

You could have seen this coming when they moved their advertising office to a spot behind a McDonald's dumpster.
Posted by: crosspatch   2009-01-06 02:43  

#1  Can't wait to read the books. Pinch has always been a '68er wannabe - Bring down the System, all that crap. Didn't figure he'd kamikaze the family jewels, though.
Posted by: mrp   2009-01-06 01:40  

00:00