| Submit your comments on this article |
| Israel-Palestine-Jordan |
| Gaza Is Not Lebanon |
| 2009-01-08 |
| Why Israel's campaign against Hamas may succeed. by Thomas Donnelly & Danielle Pletka The conventional wisdom about the incursion by Israeli ground units into Gaza, mirrored in Sunday's Washington Post, is that "Israeli leaders run the risk of repeating their disastrous experience in the 2006 Lebanon war, when they suffered high casualties in ground combat with Hezbollah." Apparently, reporters and pundits are even more prone to refighting the last war than generals: Gaza is not Lebanon; Hamas is not Hezbollah and, most critically, Israel now is not Israel in 2006. To begin with, the physical and geographical differences between southern Lebanon and the Gaza strip could hardly be greater. And while Hassan Nasrallah and the Hezbollah leadership were under air attack in the outskirts of Beirut in 2006, the Hamas leadership has far fewer places to hide in Gaza city and elsewhere in Gaza. The initial successes of the Israeli airstrikes were not just a product of much better intelligence about Hamas (though it's probable that Israeli intelligence had done a superior job of exploiting differences amongst Hamas and West Bank leaders to improve its targeting), but also reflect simple facts of proximity and smaller scale. The terrain makes perhaps an even greater difference in ground warfare. The hills of southern Lebanon are not only naturally defensible terrain--each village providing an excellent fortified fighting position--but helped to channel Israeli armored columns. A good percentage of Israeli combat deaths came from a handful of successful ambushes. |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #4 The initial successes of the Israeli airstrikes were not just a product of much better intelligence about Hamas Some of it could come from the PLO either as an organization or from memebers who had friends and relatives killed by HAMAS. |
| Posted by: JFM 2009-01-08 13:56 |
| #3 good article. |
| Posted by: liberalhawk 2009-01-08 13:34 |
| #2 Nuclear weapons are for threatening, not using. Actually using one in this day and age (even on Israel) would be beyond my comprehension. I don't know what would unfold, nuclear counter attack? UNSC sanctioned invasion? Hard to say, but it would be safe to say that if Iran had a nuke they could not shoot it at Israel for attacking Hamas. |
| Posted by: bigjim-ky 2009-01-08 13:18 |
| #1 "Whereas Hezbollah could be resupplied not from northern Lebanon, Syria, and even from the sea" shhhhhh! We want to "shock & awe" the IDF with this info. |
| Posted by: Poison Reverse 2009-01-08 12:29 |