You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Afghan and Pakistan problems are really one: Gen Petraeus
2009-01-10
US policy to win in Afghanistan must recognise the poor nation's limitations and its neighbourhood, especially its intertwined relationship with Pakistan, the top US military commander in the region said on Thursday.

"Afghanistan and Pakistan have, in many ways, merged into a single problem set, and the way forward in Afghanistan is incomplete without a strategy that includes and assists Pakistan," and also takes into account Pakistan's troubled relationship with rival India, Army Gen David Petraeus said.

He predicted a long war in Afghanistan, without quantifying it.

Petraeus told a Washington audience that a winning strategy in Afghanistan would look different from the one in Iraq. He offered few specifics as the incoming Obama administration assesses its options in the seven-year-old Afghanistan war that has gone much worse than anticipated, just as US fortunes have improved in Iraq. He also suggested the US and its partners might one day have common purpose with Iran, another Afghanistan neighbour, in stabilising and remaking that country.

"There has been nothing easy about Afghanistan, indeed nearly every aspect has been hard and that will continue to be the case in 2009 and the years beyond," Petraeus said in an address to the United States Institute of Peace.

The address was part of a conference highlighting world trouble spots at the moment of political transition in the United States. The institute released a sober outline of problems in Afghanistan as part of the session.

The report said the US and its partners have short-changed Afghanistan by focusing on short-term goals pursued without a cohesive strategy or clear understanding of how the decentralised country works. It suggested US president-elect Barack Obama should refocus the US war and rebuilding effort in Afghanistan and think of the project as the work of at least a decade.

Petraeus' own review of US strategy in Afghanistan is expected to be presented to Obama the week after he takes office. The plan would shift the focus from the waning fight in Iraq to the escalating Afghan battle.

US President George W Bush's in-house Iraq and Afghanistan adviser has already done a separate assessment; it has not been made public. The US is rushing 20,000 troops into Afghanistan to combat the Taliban.

US officials have warned the violence will probably intensify in the coming year. More US troops, 151, died in Afghanistan in 2008 than in any other year since the 2001 invasion to oust the Taliban.

A suicide bomber struck US troops patrolling on foot in southern Afghanistan on Thursday, killing at least two soldiers and three civilians and wounding at least nine others, officials said.

Iran: On Iran, Petraeus said he would leave the details to diplomats. But he suggested that the long-time US adversary could be part of a regional effort to correct Afghanistan's situation. Afghanistan's strategic location and recent history both as a cradle of terrorism and source of most of the world's heroin make it of interest to nations from the West to the Middle East and beyond.

"Iran is concerned about the narcotics trade - it doesn't want to see...extremists running Afghanistan again any more than other folks do," Petraeus said.
Posted by:Fred

#6  We have no business civilizing the Afghans or establishing a single culture or language for them or the Paks. We would be pissed if someone tried to do that to us.

We should tell them that it's their country, if they want the Taliban, they should just wait and if they don't they better get cracking because we're going home. If bad things happen to us that come from there, we'll be back and bad next time.

We have no national interests at stake in either Pakistan or Afghanistan and we should get out toot sweet. Or recognize with whom we are really at war and call it a Crusade in South Asia.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2009-01-10 16:08  

#5  The new National Afghan Military Academy, modeled on West Point, is a start at producing leaders with a shared national rather than tribal identity. Gonna take time.
Posted by: lotp   2009-01-10 15:46  

#4  A common language is an excellent idea. English is necessary for success, not just in the West, as it is the international language of the scientific world, and would open up the 21st century to them. Back in the 80's, the US took quite a few Afghan refugees in and they have done well. I know a Pashtun US graduate that speaks English well, knows 3-4 regional dialects, is computer literate and currently serving covertly. We need many more or they will never give up the poppy trade.
Posted by: Danielle   2009-01-10 14:14  

#3  Both countries aren't really countries.

There's probably and 5 different real countries/peoples in Pakistan-Afghanistan region.

Split them up and concentrate on the belligerent ones.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-01-10 04:49  

#2  Afghan and Pakistan problems are really one

Both countries are full of the followers of a psychotic, dehumanizing cult that have been working to destroy the rest of Humanity for 1400 years.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-01-10 04:04  

#1  We need to get serious about some cultural issues in Afghanistan. First of all, pick a language and teach all children in all provinces in that language. Second, build out a national entertainment/news/TV/Radio infrastructure in that language. Kids from all parts of Afghanistan should be sharing a common cultural identity. Third, get serious about building serious transportation infrastructure that interconnects all the provinces. People need to share a common language, a common cultural identity, and be able to travel easily. Producers in one province should be able to get goods to other markets. Workers in one place, to jobs in another.

Use some cultural propaganda. Have TV shows where a young couple, maybe one Uzbek and the other Pashtun marry. The old people don't like it but they are portrayed as backwards hillbillies and the kids as hip modern movers and shakers who succeed despite the comical backwardness of their tribal elders.

The people need to become Afghans and blur the tribal lines. That will begin to reduce the influence of the Pakis and other outsiders and give them confidence in their own abilities. Language, culture, communications. Those are the keys.
Posted by: crosspatch   2009-01-10 02:44  

00:00