You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
Budget office forecasts long, deep recession
2009-01-10
Even by Washington standards, the deterioration in the federal government's budget situation since September has been breathtaking.

The Congressional Budget Office projected Wednesday that the budget deficit for the current fiscal year would total $1.2 trillion. CBO's forecast does not include President-elect Barack Obama's two-year economic-stimulus bill, which is expected to cost $800 billion or more.
Money we don't have. Why not call it an 'economic pillage bill' ...
The CBO report also predicted "a marked contraction in the U.S. economy" in 2009. The gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to fall by 2.2 percent this year, steeper than in any year since 1946, when America was demobilizing from World War II. "CBO anticipates that the current recession, which started in December 2007, will last until the second half of 2009, making it the longest recession since World War II," the report said. "It could also be the deepest recession during the postwar period."

The unemployment rate, which was 6.7 percent in November, is expected to average 8.3 percent in 2009. The jobless rate will average 9 percent in 2010, when the economy will slowly recover, CBO projected. CBO expects the unemployment rate to peak at 9.2 percent in early 2010.

A major factor affecting the slow recovery will be muted consumer spending "as households continue to adjust to the large declines in net wealth of the past few years," the report said. CBO also estimated that the national average price of a home will plunge by an additional 14 percent by the second quarter of 2010. "Foreclosure rates are likely to remain high while house prices continue to fall," the report predicted.

"Things are deteriorating extremely fast at the moment," said Nigel Gault, chief economist at IHS/Global Insight. "CBO is telling the incoming Obama administration that the long-term budget outlook is much worse than previously thought."

After the economy begins to recover, the deficits could be problematic. "The deficit numbers are staggering," said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a bipartisan budget-watchdog group. "Long-term deficits can undermine the economic recovery because borrowing so much money can push up interest rates," she said. Higher interest rates could stifle business investment and choke off recovery in interest-sensitive industries like housing and autos.

CBO's economic forecast reflects "the magnitude of the depths of our economic situation," said Stan Collender, a longtime budget analyst who is managing director at Qorvis Communications. "CBO's budget forecast clearly demonstrates that there is a worst-case scenario. It can't get much worse. The budget outlook is a lot bleaker than anybody dared imagine before now."

Diane Lim Rogers, chief economist for the Concord Coalition, a nonpartisan organization advocating responsible fiscal policy, expressed concern over "the dramatically bad effect of a bad economy on tax revenues."

CBO reduced its estimate for total tax revenues over the next 10 years by more than $2 trillion since its last budget outlook was issued in September, Ms. Rogers noted. The revenue projections were "very distressing and disturbing because they are based on CBO's forecast beyond the recession, which includes a recovery," she said. CBO expects the next expansion to last at least 10 years.

Budget experts hope Mr. Obama will address the long-term budget problems in the economic speech he is to deliver Thursday at George Mason University in Fairfax. "Obama has been dealt a bad hand, but the time for leadership is now," said David Walker, former head of the Government Accountability Office who now is president and chief executive of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation.
Nothing is impossible for The One, just let him keep his Crackberry.
Posted by:Besoeker

#11  "In this town, I'm the leper with the most fingers."

Jake Gittes
Posted by: tu3031   2009-01-10 16:56  

#10  *agh!! the Greenspan pic!*

/thinking of those hands pawing Andrea Mitchell
Posted by: Frank G   2009-01-10 16:53  

#9  LOL!, g(r)om.
Posted by: Mike N.   2009-01-10 10:25  

#8   You never hear about federal government layoffs.

Yep, we've seen it when the downsized the military in the 90s. The Army went from around 900,000+ to 480,000 by the time Clinton I moved on. Of course we found out later, that was a little too much but still dawdled around before upping it a mere 30,000, on a temporary basis. Now if Obama wants to create 'new' jobs, how about increasing the force structure by a couple hundred thousand? Nah, were're the handout votes in that? /rhetorical question
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-01-10 10:02  

#7  You never hear about federal government layoffs. It's obscene.
Posted by: Hellfish   2009-01-10 09:42  

#6  Minimum wage increase causing unemployment? Come on, it's far too early for any sort of effect, quit the wishful thinking or whatever that is.

Time was, we had a deficit, we cut spending. I suppose Obama won't be doing that, though.
Posted by: gromky   2009-01-10 07:03  

#5  If I was John McCain, I'd be calling Obama to congratulate him again on his election victory. But, I guess, John is not that kind.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-01-10 04:34  

#4  Why not forecast budget cuts? What do I pay you for?
Posted by: newc   2009-01-10 04:26  

#3  I dunno. I am seeing pretty good indications of a bottom forming up in the real estate market. Unemployment is more due to states increasing their minimum wage rates on Jan 1 causing many small businesses to cut staff. California's increased unemployment, for example, is probably mostly caused by increases in the minimum wage.

it is more complicated than people want it to be.
Posted by: crosspatch   2009-01-10 03:53  

#2  I couldn't put my fingers on the problem


Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2009-01-10 02:06  

#1  "the dramatically bad effect of a bad economy on tax revenues."

This is true for all levels of government, in all developed countries.

Governments are trying to cover their shortfalls by borrowing, but we are on the verge of a lenders revolt as they realize these debts can never be repaid in uninflated dollars/pounds/etc.

2009 will be the year governments ran out of money.

BTW, reading chicken entrails is as accurate as the economic models they are using to predict the end of the recession in 2010.
Posted by: phil_b   2009-01-10 01:45  

00:00