You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
After years of leniency, Brit top judge says burglars must face stiff sentences
2009-01-18
Burglars must expect stiff punishment for violating homes, says Britain's top judge. The Lord Chief Justice yesterday urged the courts to impose harsh sentences on thieves who target vulnerable victims, steal irreplaceable sentimental items or terrify residents. Lord Judge said: 'There is a long-standing, almost intuitive belief that our homes should be our castles.

'Something precious is violated by burglary of a home, and those who perpetrate this crime should be sentenced and punished accordingly.' His strongly-worded guidance marks a significantly tougher approach to burglary following years of mounting concern over 'softly-softly' punishments, and police forces treating the offence as a low priority.

Lord Judge, sitting with two other senior judges at the Appeal Court in London, made his call for a renewed focus on the often terrible impact on victims as he threw out attempts by six convicted burglars, including heroin addict Rebecca Saw, who terrorised a young family, to have their jail terms reduced.

He took the opportunity to issue formal guidance for all courts in England and Wales calling for a robust approach to domestic break-ins.
Posted by:Fred

#7  only a tiny few are Indians. If you know what I mean.

The rest are Hong Kong gang bangers?
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-01-18 09:55  

#6  It won't work. England refuses to build more prisons, so has a "catch and release" policy for just about everything short of homicide.

N.B.: the *majority* of prisoners in England are "Asians", but only a tiny few are Indians. If you know what I mean.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2009-01-18 09:28  

#5  Home invasions are far more popular in the UK than in the US. In the UK alarm systems are likely to be turned off when the residents are at home. And British law expects homeowners to retreat when confronted by burglars. In the US, burglars take the chance of being shot by the homeowner.
Posted by: DMFD   2009-01-18 09:05  

#4  This actually works, too. My daughter's apartment in Manhattan was recently burglarized. The thief broke in and stole a laptop and a roomie's camera. That's it. True the apartment was burgled, but the place was not tossed, which adds significantly to the emotional violation.

When she asked the NYPD why they had not searched the apartment for more they said 1. thieves want to get in and out quickly because every second they are in is a chance to leave DNA evidence and 2. because the judges give much stiffer sentences when they toss the place.

Funny how that cause and effect thing works.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2009-01-18 06:37  

#3  Wow - a judge showing some indication as to recognising what the word 'justice' might actually mean. Will wonders never cease?
Posted by: Bulldog   2009-01-18 04:50  

#2  LMAO! I managed to read a few sentences before I looked at the pic. Will have to try to read again later. I cannot compose myself.
Posted by: Mike N.   2009-01-18 01:51  

#1  Whoa. Next thing you know they'll be suggesting that victims of crimes might actually have rights, too. Like self-defense.

/buIwon'tbeholdingmybreath.
Posted by: PBMcL   2009-01-18 01:45  

00:00