You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Ahmadinejad: Obama must apologize to Iran if he really wants change
2009-01-28

The line gets longer...
The new U.S. administration must apologize to Iran over past actions if it really wants to effect change, Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Wednesday.

"Those who say they want to make change, this is the change they should make: they should apologize to the Iranian nation and try to make up for their dark background and the crimes they have committed against the Iranian nation," Ahmadinejad told a rally in western Iran, broadcast live on state television. "We welcome change but on condition that change is fundamental and on the right track," he said.
Do they want "hope" too, or is that negotiable?
The new administration has said Obama would break from his predecessor by pursuing direct talks with Tehran but has also warned Iran to expect more pressure if it did not meet the UN Security Council demand to halt its disputed nuclear work. Washington and its Western allies accuse Iran of seeking to build nuclear weapons. Tehran denies the charge and refuses to give up work it insists is its sovereign right.

Ahmadinejad listed during his speech a range of "crimes" against Iran, such as trying to block what Tehran says is a peaceful nuclear power generation program, hindering Iran's development since the 1979 revolution and other actions by several administrations for more than 60 years. Iran has in the past told Washington that it should withdraw its troops from the region.

Ahmadinejad, in his speech, said: "Who has asked them (the United States) to come and interfere in the affairs of nations?"

As well as saying Tehran wants nuclear arms, Washington accuses Iran of sponsoring "terrorists" and undermining efforts to make peace in the Middle East between Israel and Arabs. Echoing Obama's remarks, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton signaled the administration's readiness to talk to Iran, saying Tehran had a "clear opportunity" to show the world it is willing to engage.
Posted by:tu3031

#16  ION CHINESE MIL FORUM > POSTER believes a feasible OBAMA ADMIN WWIII SCENARIO would have RUSSIA + CHINA + IRAN + PAKISTAN + MILITANTS versus USA + BRITAIN + ISRAEL + INDIA???

Prob Trigger = FAILURE OF US-WORLD/UNO TO STOP SUCCESSFUL IRANIAN NUCLEARIZATION NLT 2010 [Uranium/"Dirty Bomb(s)"] INDUCING A MAJOR ISRAELI MIL = PREEMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKE AGZ IRAN???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-01-28 20:18  

#15  how about this for both I'm a dinnerjacket and Zero:

honi soit qui mal y pense

Posted by: NoMoreBS   2009-01-28 14:45  

#14  i'm surprised he hasn't been over there and put his lips squarely up against their asses yet
Posted by: rabid whitetail   2009-01-28 14:18  

#13  Obama should remind him of all the wheat we are selling Iran in a time of drought.
Posted by: Penguin   2009-01-28 13:52  

#12  Ahmadinejad we are sorry you are alive.

Done.
Posted by: Icerigger   2009-01-28 13:25  

#11  I think the United States SHOULD apologize, but only after doing something that requires an apology, such as nuking twenty cities in Iran. THEN we'd have something to apologize for - "Geez, I'm sorry we made such a mess of your country... Maybe we could come over and help you clean up the place. We have a couple of Army divisions not doing anything at the moment."
Posted by: Old Patriot   2009-01-28 13:25  

#10  "Oderint dum metuant"

..becomes...

"Let them jeer, so long as they don't think we're, like, uncool."
Posted by: Bulldog   2009-01-28 13:24  

#9  "We are sorry for not supporting the Shah further, for despite all his faults and cruelties he was not a madman leading his people to nuclear destruction. We will hand of James Carter for punishment and then work to undo our mistakes forthwith."

Will that apology suffice?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2009-01-28 12:16  

#8  The Big O can send Peanut with the apology... he'd love to crawl to Tehran and kiss Nutjob's big toe.
Posted by: Andy Phavitch2922   2009-01-28 12:06  

#7  Let's bomb them a little and then apologize. Oops! Sorry.
Posted by: SteveS   2009-01-28 11:26  

#6  Monday the O said "because all too often the United States starts by dictating —".

Yesterday Clinton said "We have a lot of damage to repair,".

And Ahmanutjob is just agreeing with them.
Posted by: DoDo   2009-01-28 11:10  

#5  If.....

There a number of methods in which intent or an apology can be extended. Techniques which are well understood and accepted in that part of the world. Quite a lot goes on in the diplomatic community that never sees the light of day.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-01-28 11:00  

#4  If Bambi does, he is truly spineless and the world will take full advantage of American weakness. If he doesn't, well ... he can at least say no.
Posted by: DarthVader   2009-01-28 10:52  

#3  Hillary, who is probably smart enough to understand at least some of the problems with dealing with Iran, may be secretly smiling. With luck, Ahmadinedjad will go a few steps further (US must apologize for aid to Israel, US must apologize for low oil prices, US must apologize for the problems with the drapes in the Presidential palace, etc.)and Hillary will be absolved of her direction from Obama to engage Iran.
Posted by: mhw   2009-01-28 10:45  

#2  This really pisses me off. If BO actually does this, that's it for me. It's Iran who needs to apologize to the US for kidnapping our diplomats. How about some compensation for time and suffering, and property? Still waiting...
Posted by: Spot   2009-01-28 10:45  

#1  well, Ahmed-needs-Jihad heard the Al-Arabiya interview and he essentially heard the Sunni-version of an apology, so he's wantin the shia version.
Posted by: hammerhead   2009-01-28 10:09  

00:00