You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
A wealth-eater administration
2009-02-11
The Derb man strikes again
If professional investment advisors sometimes can't make sense of the economy, how good do you think politicians and bureaucrats are at it? Right. They don't have the beginning of a clue. Keep that in mind when you hear them talk about "stimulating consumption" and "creating jobs." The congresscritters, paper-shufflers, and gubmint time-servers of Washington D.C. don't have a freaking clue. They're not wealth-creators; they're wealth-eaters.

That includes the new administration. Why would they have a clue? Very few of them have ever done anything an ordinary citizen would recognize as work. Here's the Obama cabinet.

Attorney General Eric Holder Government lawyering
Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack Lawyering, politics
Secretary of Commerce Judd Gregg Lawyering, politics

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates CIA, MilInt
Secretary of Education Arne Duncan Education bureaucrat (never taught)
Secretary of Energy Steven Chu Research physicist, academic
Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Daschle MilInt, politics
Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano Lawyering, politics
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Shaun Donovan Govt. bureaucrat
Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar Lawyering, politics
Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis Professional Hispanic
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Politician's wife, Politician
Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood High School teaching, politics
Secretary of the Treasury Timothy_Geithner Lobbyist, bureaucrat, diplomat, tax evader
Secretary of Veterans' Affairs Eric Shinseki Military

Just look at those résumés! Military service is certainly honorable; Steven Chu seems to have added something to human understanding and capability; and I suppose there is some necessary number of lawyers, bureaucrats, and even politicians we have to put up with. (Though in these days of telecommuting, I don't see why they can't all be sequestered on one of the Aleutian Islands so we don't have to look at their sleek, smug, self-important faces.) Nobody in that list, though, not one, has any acquaintance with the production of wealth.

Our civilization rests on our having enough citizens possessed of the ability to turn a nickel into a dime, and a government that keeps out of the way while they do it. Nobody in Obama's cabinet has any idea how to turn nickels into dimes, least of all the Wealth-Eater-in-Chief. In his autobiography, Obama described his one brief experience in the world of private enterprise as a sort of endurance test--a purgatory he had to suffer before ascending to the heaven of "community organizing." He felt, he tells us, "like a spy behind enemy lines." Those private-sector money-grubbers, trying to squeeze some wealth out of a reluctant world--that's the enemy in Obama's universe. A friend would presumably be someone who squeezes wealth out of big, litigation-whipped corporations, guilty white liberals, foundations taken over by leftist ideologues, and of course the ever-milkable taxpayer.

This is an administration of wealth-eaters and wealth-spenders, not wealth-creators. If you were to sit at Obama's cabinet table with all officers present and ask them where money comes from, they would reply in happy unison: "Why, from a government paycheck, of course! Everybody knows that!" The grubby, demeaning work of pulling things out of the earth, or harvesting things grown on the earth's surface, or turning things into other things, or persuading people to buy things--all of that is mysterious to them, and they would prefer it to remain so.

We should, therefore, do well to heed the words of Arnold Kling:
Sooner or later the U.S. government is going to have to get serious about stripping the assets of those of us who have tried to live within our means. Sooner or later, the profligate are going to take from the prudent, the grasshopper is going to confiscate the property of the ants.

I feel sure the wealth-eaters--Obama and his pals--are furious with the productive working people of the country for somehow having fallen down on the job--the job, that is, of providing wealth-eaters with, as Sir Robert Walpole used to say, "enough pasture for all the sheep." We exist to feed them. Without the money they take from us, they will have nothing to eat. Kling is undoubtedly right: When their fury abates, they will set about taking their revenge by robbing us blind, using all the force of law, all the power of the federal government, and all the gassy pseudo-inspirational rhetoric our Wealth-Eater-in-Chief can muster.
Posted by:g(r)omgoru

#9  I wonder how long it will take all of the pathological Bush Bashers to have an ephipany about GWB vs. BHO?

NAH, the MSM will go to their graves or bankrupcy court and never admit that BHO is an empty suit.

I find it amazing that the Demos never vett their candidates. I guess that means any idiot with a good fund raiser campaign can run for President.
Posted by: James Carville   2009-02-11 23:40  

#8  I would not be at all surprised to see General Petreaus drop his retirement papers any day now.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-02-11 13:18  

#7  This is a radical overthrow of our form of government. When the officer corp starts to leave, Obama and his minions will then raise their "brown shirt" domestic army to control the rest of us. They said it could never happen here. Bah.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2009-02-11 12:51  

#6  How many foolish tax cheating socialist lobbiest do you need to run an administration?

This administration is Fail from the onset.
Posted by: newc   2009-02-11 12:39  

#5  > When their fury abates, they will set about taking their revenge by robbing us blind, using all the force of law, all the power of the federal government, and all the gassy pseudo-inspirational rhetoric our Wealth-Eater-in-Chief can muster.

But only ONCE! After the golden goose is murdered you will have nothing and the other golden flock will fly away.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles the flatulent   2009-02-11 09:49  

#4  The term 'Looter' comes to mind. Rolls off the tongue much easier than 'Wealth-eater'.

I'm not an Ann Rynd fan but think she got that one right.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-02-11 09:15  

#3  Simply a load of arrogant, pompous clowns. Peloosi isn't cabinet but certainly one of the dumbest trogs in DC. These bumblers will do one thing only, turn gold into lead.
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter 2700   2009-02-11 08:55  

#2  I very much enjoyed being lectured in generalities by a haughty Tim Geinther on the telly the other day. The longer he spoke the more I felt like pitching a chair through the screen. The thieving bastard was just about all I could stand.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-02-11 08:37  

#1  Two of my personal prerequisites for President.

1. Has to have worked for ten or more years in the for-profit private sector.

2. Has to have served in the military.

Obama has neither. And we'll all suffer for it.
Posted by: no mo uro   2009-02-11 08:10  

00:00