| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| US drops 'enemy combatant' as detention basis |
| 2009-03-14 |
The Obama administration dropped the term "enemy combatant" and incorporated international law on Friday as its basis for holding terrorism suspects at Guantanamo prison while it works to close the facility. The U.S. Justice Department said it had filed court papers outlining its break from Bush administration detention standards, and said only those who provided "substantial" support to al-Qaeda or the Taliban would be considered detainable. We'll feed the rest of them to the sharks. Ha ha ha...nah, just kidding. "As we work towards developing a new policy to govern detainees, it is essential that we operate in a manner that strengthens our national security, is consistent with our values, and is governed by law," U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement. "The change we've made today meets each of those standards and will make our nation stronger." How do ya figure, Mistah Attorney General? Because you say so? And what happens if you're wrong? Unlike under former President George W. Bush, who greatly sought to expand presidential powers during his term, the new detention policy does not rely on the president's powers as military commander in chief to hold terrorism suspects at Guantanamo. That policy has been subject to numerous legal battles and Supreme Court rulings that rebuked the Bush administration. Instead, the Justice Department said, "It draws on the international laws of war to inform the statutory authority conferred by Congress." "It provides that individuals who supported al-Qaeda or the Taliban are detainable only if the support was substantial. And it does not employ the phrase 'enemy combatant.'" So what are they considered now? Naughty boys? Islamic pixies? It said it had told the court that the Obama administration was reviewing its entire detention policy — as part of its plan to close the prison at the U.S. naval base on Guantanamo Bay, Cuba — and further refinements of the policies were possible. Sounds like everybody but the hardcore gets broomed and the problem "goes away". Learn the lesson, boys. Take no prisoners. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #4 I thought it was Just Some Guys From the Neighborhood. Better luck next time, Mike. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2009-03-14 17:28 |
| #3 Undocumented Protagonists Undocumented Soldiers Home Boys Dudes Innocent Wayward Goat Herders Misunderstood Theologians Theological Pyrotechnicians AllahÂ’s Promise Keepers Future ACORN Employees 9/11 Victims Victims of the Great Jewish Conspiracy Community Disorganizers Friends of the Family Citizens of the World ObamaCorps Members The Disenfranchized Sea Kittens Unlicensed Pilots Homewreckers Inevitable Recidivists Unfinished Business Civil Disobedience Advocates Peace Negotiators Unexpected Guests Buffalo TV Station Executives Jihad Joes Misunderstood Youths Our Guests Community Activists The Virgin-Bound Innocent Victims Dynamite People Community Agitators Targets of Opportunity Lighthearted Strangers Potential Friends Inquisition Sufferers Waterboard Rejects Enemy Combat Ants CAIR Bears Friends of Obama ObamaÂ’s Heros Just Some Guys From the Neighborhood Anti-Soviet Freedom Fighters Building Demolition Assistants Ordnance Development Technicians Doctors of Cerebral Amputation Madrassa Graduate Students Defenders of Female Honor by Lapidation Subjects of Enhanced Interrogation Alleged Violators of Afghan Brady Bill Muslim Victims of Neocon Imperialism Sleep-Deprived Dreamers World Court v. Bush Plaintiffs QurÂ’an Desecration Witnesses Friends of Fidel 1,001 Arabian Knights QurÂ’an Parrots of the Caribbean Evildoers Talibunnies Jihadis Without Borders Moslem Mahatma Ghandis |
| Posted by: Just a Guy In the Neighborhood 2009-03-14 16:28 |
| #2 Mike Sylwester has been pooplisted.] |
| Posted by: Mike Sylvester 2009-03-14 12:21 |
| #1 [Mike Sylwester has been pooplisted.] |
| Posted by: Mike Sylwester 2009-03-14 12:21 |