You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
And Another One???
2009-03-15
The Intel Czar's Picks: Not Too Intelligent?
By Mark Hosenball and Michael Isikoff | NEWSWEEK
Two of the dumber journalists at Newsweak go after the Obama administration for being stupid. Worth the price of admission just for that ...
Add president Obama's national intelligence czar, Dennis Blair, to the list of embattled top-level appointees. Blair, a retired four-star Navy admiral who attended Oxford with Bill Clinton, courted controversy among pro-Israel and anti-China activists this month when he named Charles (Chas) Freeman, an outspoken former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, to chair the National Intelligence Council, a committee of the government's top intel analysts. After House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other pols complained to the White House, Freeman abruptly withdrew. Now both Republican and Democratic intel experts are raising questions about another Blair pick: John Deutch, a former CIA director once accused of major security lapses, who's been appointed to a temporary panel reviewing troubled, top-secret spy-satellite programs.
Is he working from home?
After Deutch resigned as CIA director in 1996, agency officials discovered he had stored hundreds of pages of classified files on his home computers, despite repeated warnings that they could be intercepted via the Internet. Because of the incident, Deutch was stripped of his high-level security clearances, and a criminal probe into the matter culminated in January 2001, when the ex-spy chief agreed to plead guilty to misdemeanor charges of mishandling classified material. (The next day, Clinton, in one of his final acts as president, pardoned him.) Given Deutch's history, congressional officials want to know why Blair placed him on a panel so sensitive that its work should require an ultra-top-secret security clearance known as SI/TK (Special Intelligence/Talent-Keyhole). "The decision to grant [Deutch] a security clearance again is an affront," GOP Sen. Kit Bond, the vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told NEWSWEEK, adding that it "should be reversed immediately." An agency spokesman acknowledged that former CIA director Michael Hayden restored Deutch's security clearance a couple of years ago so Hayden could consult with him and other ex-spy chiefs on "classified CIA matters." But Blair also has broad power to grant security clearances. (Deutch did not respond to requests for comment.)
I'll bet he didn't. The man shouldn't be allowed in Washington as a visitor during cherry blossom season and yet is being treated as an insider. It says something about the thinness of Bambi's rolodex ...
Congressional critics, including some Democrats, say the two appointments illustrate Blair's tin ear.
And lack of, er, intelligence ...
As he vigorously defended Freeman, Blair also underplayed evidence of substantial financial ties between the Middle East Policy Council, a think tank Freeman used to run, and Saudi interests. Blair had told Congress that "no more than one 12th" of the council's $600,000 budget came from the Saudi government. But Freeman told NEWSWEEK that the council had also received a $1 million endowment from Saudi King Abdullah in 2005, plus another $1 million pledge for operating support from Saudi Prince Alwaleed.
One could have said similar things about James Baker, but you'll notice George Bush at least kept his distance from his father's favorite advisor.
"Director Blair was asked by the president to ... seek the best expertise, and to provide the best intelligence," says Wendy Morigi, a spokesperson for the intel czar. "That's exactly what he's doing."
This is all so ludicrous as to excite explanations of conspiracy with intent to undermine.
Posted by:Omoter Speaking for Boskone7794

#6  for goodness sake. President Obama retains his Blackberry, and I'm sure uses it frequently. What greater security risk can there be?
Posted by: trailing wife    2009-03-15 18:11  

#5  Last time I was read-off from SI-something access
I remember that even writing or saying certain specific words was a felony. Where might one go to report any possible violations by the NYT.....The Obama Administration? Sadly, not encouraging ....
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2009-03-15 14:10  

#4  Oh please Obama, please nominate Sandy Berger for something in the Intel area. Please.
Posted by: mhw   2009-03-15 13:35  

#3  Charged and convicted of improper handling and storage classified, clearance and access revoked and he's being read-on to SI/TK again?

Sets a lovely legal precedent. Very lovely. They have substantially elevated the risk level and made every security manager's task more difficult. Of course after former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger's escapades, why should anyone be surprised.

Posted by: Besoeker    2009-03-15 11:43  

#2  Bernie Schwartz can't be far behind.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2009-03-15 11:27  

#1  (Special Intelligence/Talent-Keyhole)

"Special" as in "Olympics"
and "Key" is not the right three-letter word
Posted by: Frank G   2009-03-15 11:15  

00:00