You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
US soldier guilty in killing of 4 Iraqis in 2007
2009-03-30
A military court convicted a second soldier of murder in the execution-style slayings of four bound and blindfolded Iraqi detainees in 2007 after the soldier pleaded guilty at his court-martial Monday.

Wearing his dress uniform and speaking crispy and confidently, Sgt. 1st Class Joseph Mayo, of Fort Bragg, North Carolina, pleaded guilty to charges of premeditated murder and conspiracy to commit premeditated murder at the proceeding at the U.S. Army's Rose Barracks in southern Germany.

He pleaded not guilty to a charge of obstruction of justice in the incident, which occurred while he was deployed to Iraq. Military prosecutors dropped that charge. The 27-year-old will be sentenced later Monday and faces the possibility of life in prison, along with a reduction in rank to private, forfeiture of all pay and a dishonorable discharge.

In February a military court convicted Sgt. Michael Leahy, 28, of Lockport, Illinois, to life in prison with the possibility of parole after he admitted to the execution-style killing of one of the detainees and shooting another. He was acquitted of murder over a separate incident in Baghdad in January 2007.

According to testimony at previous courts-martial, at least four Iraqis were taken into custody in spring 2007 after a shootout with a patrol.

The Iraqis were taken to the U.S. unit's operating base in Baghdad for questioning and processing, although there was not enough evidence to hold them for attacking the unit. Later that night patrol members took the Iraqis to a remote area and shot them in retribution for the attacks on the unit, according to testimony.

Mayo, Leahy and Master Sgt. John Hatley, 40, are accused of pulling the trigger. "Hatley stated that if we took (the) individuals to detention they'd be released in a matter of days," Mayo told the court. "He said we should take care of them. I agreed."
Posted by:ed

#4  That, and the detainees ideally wouldnt be left with captors directly involved in the shoot out at any point in time, for obvious reasons. Just asking for trouble. I also love how the lowest ranking of the group, the SGT had already gotten charged first. It might be another charming example of how shit rolls downhill in the military, if I am reading this even remotely right. But the Court Martial will get them to pay for all their tresspasses. Theyre effective to say the least.
Posted by: GirlThursday   2009-03-30 20:17  

#3  I look at this through the lenses of "maintaining good order and discipline".

Stuff like this usually happens only when there are morale problems in a unit, so as soon as these soldiers were arrested, a very senior chaplain and a very senior NCO should have arrived to diagnose the situation.

Between the two of them, it would be the unit equivalent of an MRI and an X-Ray. There would be no morale secrets left in that unit. Bad NCOs and officers would vanish, any other crimes would be discovered, soldiers with problems would be rehabilitated.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2009-03-30 19:23  

#2  I wasn't there with them so I don't feel qualified to judge their actions.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2009-03-30 11:12  

#1  Who needs an international court when we're fully capable of cleaning house ourselves [well at least our military]. Now if the other branches of government were as consistent in cleaning house...
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-03-30 09:33  

00:00