You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Pakistan seeks additional $30 billion U.S. aid
2009-04-08
Pakistan has asked for a $30 billion Marshall Plan-like package for Pakistan and Afghanistan over the next five years to fight the al-Qaeda, blunt anti-American sentiment and secure Pakistan from extremists bent on destabilising its civilian government.

The demand was made by Pakistan's Ambassador to U.S. Husain Haqqani in an interview with the Washington Times published on Wednesday.
'Demand'?
Mr. Haqqani, who plans to attend an international donors meeting for Pakistan in Tokyo next week, said that the cost to the West was negligible compared to that of rescuing failing banks and corporations.
Except that these are our banks ...
"And the impact in terms of American security and in terms of the longer term stability of the world in a very precarious region will be far greater," he said, claiming "Pakistan has the will to fight terrorists, it needs the means and the United States should provide those."
So they're threatening not to fight terrorism. Question is, will we notice?
The ambassador denied published reports that Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) was helping the Taliban, which the spy agency helped create 20 years ago. "There are contacts for source building," Mr. Haqqani said. "The era of active support for jihadis is over."
As of when?
Mr. Haqqani said he understood concerns regarding Pakistan's past efforts to fight Taliban extremism in the region, but that the ruling Pakistan People's Party is fully committed to the war on terror and to partnership with the U.S.. "It is time for our allies, our partners, especially the United States, to understand that any misgivings and disagreements that relate to the past should not come in the way of helping Pakistan in the present and for the future," he said.

He cautioned, however, that it would take time to change attitudes in Pakistan. "This is not a switch that can be turned on and off," he said. It "takes a while for the counter-narrative to be accepted."
"How long a while?"
"A very long while!"
Despite Mr. Haqqani's assurances that the Zardari government is gaining in strength, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman last week introduced a bill that would withhold U.S. military aid to Pakistan unless the president certifies that it is not supporting terrorist attacks on India.
Posted by:john frum

#6  What's the incentive for Pakistan to stop sponsoring islamic terrorism when the US is willing to provide their entire military budget and then some? Seems to me that Pakistan's underhanded sponsorship of the WTC attacks was the smartest, though high risk, thing they have done since independence from Britain.
Posted by: ed   2009-04-08 22:35  

#5  At least with the banks there's some hope that a bailout will work, but with Pakistain, you know it will not. We could pour $30 trillion into that black hole and see nothing positive emerge.
Posted by: Spot   2009-04-08 13:17  

#4  Worked for GM. Why not?
Posted by: gorb   2009-04-08 13:06  

#3  Barry's big on "pay for performance". How about 5 billion for Bin Laden's head on a stick, 4 Billion for Zawahiri's, 3 billion for Blinky's...
Show us the heads, we'll show you the money.
Posted by: tu3031   2009-04-08 12:46  

#2  How about paying them with some of those worthless "derivatives?"
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-04-08 12:25  

#1  The cash drawer must be about empty.
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-04-08 12:23  

00:00