You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
NYT: Debt at $1.3 Billion - "high quality journalism is valued by readers and advertisers."
2009-04-22
One day after The New York Times received five Pulitzer Prizes, The New York Times Company said in its 2009 First-Quarter conference call that total revenue had declined 18.6 percent. The company's debt at the end of the quarter totaled $1.3 billion.

According to the Times Company's press release this morning, the company suffered an "operating loss of $61.6 million compared with operating profit of $6.2 million in the first quarter of 2008."

In the release, Ms. Robinson conceded that, "The effect of the global economic downturn, coupled with the secular changes affecting newspapers, resulted in significant declines in revenues. Advertisers pulled back on print placements in all categories -- national, retail and especially classified. Digital revenues also declined, although modestly, as a result of the weakening economy."

Some cost-saving measures mentioned in the nearly hour-long call (audio here) included a consolidation of The Boston Globe's printing facilities that resulted in $9 million in savings and a staff reduction of 15% from last year.

As far as online goes, Ms. Robinson said, "Twice we have experimented with charging for Times content." She noted that nytimes.com gets got 52.3 million unique visitors in March 2009 and told investors that The Times had looked at the business models of thirty organizations to determine new opportunities for online revenue. "We continue to explore payment models." Near the end of the call, she reminded investors that, "this isn't just a print company anymore."
Nothing replaces alienating half your potential customers ...
If Business Insider's Henry Blodget's numbers crunching is to be believed, it might not even be that! "At the current rate of cash consumption, assuming no one-time expenses (highly unlikely), we estimate that the company will max out its current borrowing capacity in 4 quarters," Mr. Blodget wrote this morning. "At that point, it will owe about $1.2 billion in debt."

As far as the The Times Pulitzer wins go, Ms. Robinson said, "this speaks to the extraordinary work done by our journalists in a broad range of areas" and noted, "we continue to see high quality journalism is valued by readers and advertisers."
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#13  RIP. No need to speak ill of the dead and fatally wounded. Their reward/punishment lies in Greater Hands than mine.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2009-04-22 18:25  

#12  One Pulitzer was handed to their photographer.

Category? Obama on the campaign trail.

LOL bunch of phonies.
Posted by: Zorba Craising6734   2009-04-22 16:04  

#11  Pinning a dollar to it is setting up for the bailout. Just think, now we will be paying to get slimed!
Posted by: 49 Pan   2009-04-22 16:02  

#10  "As far as the The Times Pulitzer wins go, Ms. Robinson said, 'this speaks to the extraordinary work done by our journalists in a broad range of areas'"

Such as LYING - like Walter Duranty?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-04-22 15:52  

#9  Low quality journalism, on the other hand,...

Yep. Jayson Blair, anyone???
Posted by: Zorba Craising6734   2009-04-22 15:11  

#8  Money talks, bullshit is what the news media purveys.

Putting Money Where Mouths Are: Media Donations Favor Dems 100-1

For those that think Fox leans towards the Republicans, examine where the political contributions went. Though it does look like Fox News discourages political donations, I think in the 2004 election Fox News went 60-40% in favor of Dems.
Posted by: ed   2009-04-22 14:26  

#7  ...we continue to see high quality journalism is valued by readers and advertisers....

Low
quality journalism, on the other hand,...
Posted by: Mike   2009-04-22 13:59  

#6  FTA; "we continue to see high quality journalism is valued by readers and advertisers."

Yup. That's why they are going broke. The advertisers and readers have made their own evaluation of the worth of the NYT.
Posted by: tipover   2009-04-22 13:09  

#5  Sounds just like the Times, blame anything but the truth.

Truth, Your paper has become a part of the demoratit party, to be specific the propaganda arm of the democratic party, and people who discover you're NOT publishing "News" leave.

LIE all economy is down, that's the ONLY reason we're doing bad.

RESULT, Bye Bye lying assholes.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-04-22 13:08  

#4  So with a Pulitzer Prize and a buck I guess I can get a doughnut...
Posted by: tu3031   2009-04-22 12:52  

#3  Secular, in the catholic meaning of the word.
Posted by: Earl   2009-04-22 12:39  

#2  Faster please.
Posted by: Iblis   2009-04-22 12:31  

#1  "...coupled with the secular changes affecting newspapers...".
Huh? Lost in translation? Or am I just too dense. Again.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2009-04-22 12:20  

00:00