| Submit your comments on this article | |
| -Short Attention Span Theater- | |
| Australia's Miss Universe finalist 'dangerously underweight' | |
| 2009-04-24 | |
| |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #26 So quick to judge. You guys thought the Git beatings were bad too. Sounds real popularist to me. |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2009-04-24 23:39 |
| #25 But how does she feel about gay marriage? |
| Posted by: DoDo 2009-04-24 17:03 |
| #24 I call bull on the BMI calculator - I'm 6'3"" and 200# and I look like a scarecrow - the BMI has me just in the overweight category |
| Posted by: Punky Omirt6227 2009-04-24 16:17 |
| #23 http://anorexiapictures.net/?q=node/8 |
| Posted by: ex-lib 2009-04-24 15:17 |
| #22 IMO, the winner Rachael Finch wasn't that much different. Five pounds maybe. |
| Posted by: ex-lib 2009-04-24 15:09 |
| #21 the body mass index calculator is here. Per this site, she should weigh a minimum of 132 pounds. According to the article she actually weighs 108. |
| Posted by: mhw 2009-04-24 13:34 |
| #20 This woman is so skinny, she could fall in the category of unsuspecting women discover they have become expectant mothers by a fluke. TV SHOW: "I didnt Know I was Pregnant" http://www.tvguide.com/tvshows/didnt-know-pregnant/296824 As for heavy heavy women, they are not fooling anyone, even if polite society won't openly scold them. Either end of the spectrum is obviously less sought after. |
| Posted by: GirlThursday 2009-04-24 13:15 |
| #19 That's the best looking chick they could find in Australia? No. That's what happens when you have the likes of Perez Hilton judging the contest. |
| Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2009-04-24 12:21 |
| #18 That's the best looking chick they could find in Australia? |
| Posted by: tu3031 2009-04-24 11:32 |
| #17 FunnyÂ…you never hear those kind of public statements about fat women do you? LetÂ’s give it try shall we? "She would be categorised as |
| Posted by: DepotGuy 2009-04-24 11:30 |
| #16 GirlThursday, you're assuming she could even get pregnant. Poor girl makes Lara Flynn Boyle look chunky, and that's saying something. |
| Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie 2009-04-24 09:49 |
| #15 re #4: Mike, I can certainly agree with you about ribs visible in the back. I got my growth spurt late going from 5'3" as a HS sophmore to 6'3" when I was 21. My ribs were then visible in the back at my weight of 168. What's frightening is that my weight then is now deemed proper by the totally bogus BMI scale. That's what the socialist brown shirts of Obamanation want to force on us. |
| Posted by: AlanC 2009-04-24 09:45 |
| #14 I was just playing |
| Posted by: Beavis 2009-04-24 09:29 |
| #13 Just saying, that question goes under the heading of "where babies come from." Her baby would prolly be one of those underweight babies that weighs 3 pounds. Hows that for disturbing? |
| Posted by: GirlThursday 2009-04-24 08:59 |
| #12 I wonder, does she even get a cycle? I could've my whole life without that visual. |
| Posted by: Beavis 2009-04-24 08:49 |
| #11 She looks like her subcutaneous fat is nill. Healthy women should have somewhere around 15-25% of their body weight made up of stored fat. Women's bodies store estrogen in the fat, which is the crucial for health and reproduction. I wonder, does she even get a cycle? |
| Posted by: GirlThursday 2009-04-24 08:47 |
| #10 "I'm sick of eating grass & tree bark soup every day, Kimmie. I'm outta here!" |
| Posted by: Raj 2009-04-24 08:33 |
| #9 Looks like she recently escaped from Mauthausen. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2009-04-24 07:30 |
| #8 Yuk. I guess she wouldn't be much good helping at yard work or dragging a buck out of the woods. Looks like she couldn't lift a bullfrog. Sad part is, there's a fair number of guys who would find this type ideal. Too much TV in their youth, I would guess. Slim and muscular is OK, but that's not what I'm seeing. This poor girl needs some mass just to look like she's disease-free, let alone attractive. Moderation in everything. Fried chicken and beer once in a while wouldn't kill her. In fact, it might save her. |
| Posted by: no mo uro 2009-04-24 06:01 |
| #7 Unfortunately, from my knowledge of her industry, she is less likely to have an eating disorder and more likely to be taking a 'dietary supplement'- heroin. H is a 2 in 1, it suppresses appetite, and addles your brain enough that you think it's attractive to be a size zero. |
| Posted by: Free Radical 2009-04-24 05:54 |
| #6 Was it Jackie Onassis or Princess Diana or Audrey Hepburn who said “One can never be too rich or too thin.” ? |
| Posted by: tipper 2009-04-24 05:26 |
| #5 She's definality a puker, pizza and burgers won't help that girl. |
| Posted by: Lumpy Angaith3743 2009-04-24 05:14 |
| #4 Ribs showing in the back is a definite badbad. And how about those arms. |
| Posted by: Mike N. 2009-04-24 02:45 |
| #3 Hip bones sticking out, small boobs, she definately looks undernourished to me. |
| Posted by: Redneck Jim 2009-04-24 02:19 |
| #2 Poor thing believed the report saying fat people cause global warming. |
| Posted by: Zorba Craising6734 2009-04-24 01:26 |
| #1 Creepy. Give that gal some pizza and a cheeseburger. |
| Posted by: SteveS 2009-04-24 01:11 |