| Submit your comments on this article |
| Britain |
| US shock jock Savage targeted 'to balance least wanted list' |
| 2009-07-26 |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #8 One civil servant, again unnamed, counselled caution, saying: 'I think we could be accused of duplicity in naming him' - without explaining why - and even added that 'the fact that he is homophobic does help'. Must be one hellva list to add in Mormons [and Black Fundamentalist Churches] and over half the voting population of California on it if they use that criteria. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2009-07-26 20:58 |
| #7 Sounds like it could become a significant problem for Mr. Brown. I have no problem with that. |
| Posted by: Richard of Oregon 2009-07-26 20:38 |
| #6 I can't see the downside, OP. |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2009-07-26 19:04 |
| #5 I know a lot of people that work for the government. I also know a few bureaucrats. The two are NOT ALWAYS the same. However, if we rid ourselves of all the bureaucrats, we'd also have to shut down several government agencies. Wait now, what... |
| Posted by: Old Patriot 2009-07-26 18:32 |
| #4 Who is wondering? |
| Posted by: bman 2009-07-26 11:13 |
| #3 And people wonder why I have such a hatred of unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2009-07-26 10:11 |
| #2 So to follow the UK's logic let's: 1) arrest an equal number of women for rape since a disproportion number of the rape arrests are of men. 2) Find a few Amish to include on the FBI Terrorist list. 3) Let's proportionally allocate homeland security funds to put the dozen or so KKK members living in a trailer park out of business. |
| Posted by: hammerhead 2009-07-26 09:15 |
| #1 How bureaucrats think: a case study. |
| Posted by: Mike 2009-07-26 08:36 |