You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Women are getting more beautiful
2009-07-27
Posted by:tipper

#13  Compare and contrast...

http://glumbert.com/media/womenfilm
Posted by: tu3031   2009-07-27 23:13  

#12  Wrong conclusion. Our idea of what's beautiful what's changing. Essentially the bar is lowering. Compare any of the old movie 'dames' with most of their modern counterparts.

Sure, Cameron Diaz isn't ugly and certainly way hotter than Ben Stein, but head-to-head against Hepburn or Liz Taylor...
Posted by: Mike N.   2009-07-27 23:07  

#11  All those wonderful anti-aging lotions now available in the drugstore's cosmetics aisle; relatively inexpensive and easily available plastic surgery; botox (not a look I appreciate properly, but some do); new and improved cosmetics, hair dyes, hair conditioners that curl or straighten or control frizziness, also available in the drugstore's cosmetics aisle... I worked briefly doing research in this area, and still have some contact with the field -- there's an awful lot of science behind "new and improved" in the beauty care sector, especially for the grocery/drug store beauty aisle products.

More women are more able to look attractive in the currently fashionable mode than ever before. That doesn't actually mean the women are more beautiful than heretofore.
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-07-27 22:25  

#10  bahh! That's why God gave us blowdryers and space heaters
Posted by: Frank G   2009-07-27 22:24  

#9  Right. As long as shes hot enough to have a temperature above 98 degrees, its all good. /sarc
Posted by: GirlThursday   2009-07-27 22:14  

#8  Men discriminate, Percy?

I thought as long as a woman was (usually) breathing.... ;-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-07-27 21:30  

#7  Perhaps men are just getting less discriminating..... naw, impossible.
Posted by: Percy Ulenter9784   2009-07-27 21:01  

#6  Umm, yea, the scientific evidence is a little dubious.


what about all the plain janes "forgetting" to take their pills who level the playing field?
Posted by: GirlThursday   2009-07-27 20:48  

#5  If women are evolving yet men are not, it seems that women must be competing more strongly for males than the reverse.

Fight bitches! Winner gets Moi!
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-07-27 19:33  

#4  while men remain as aesthetically unappealing as their caveman ancestors

I feel better already. Now, where'd I put that mastodon bone. Oh yeah, over there on the sofa.
Posted by: DMFD   2009-07-27 17:56  

#3  from the article,

"...The researchers have found beautiful women have more children than their plainer counterparts and that a higher proportion of those children are female..."

The finding that beautiful women have a higher proportion of daughters than sons smells like BS.
Posted by: Lord garth   2009-07-27 16:46  

#2  I figured it was something about Beer Goggles
Posted by: Frank G   2009-07-27 16:32  

#1  Ah, the kind of article that only a Brit newspaper would publish.

But I bet Tipper posted this so that we could snark.

Nope, not me, I know better :-)
Posted by: Steve White   2009-07-27 15:35  

00:00