You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
U.S. deaths in Afghanistan headed for another record - Feingold wants withdrawal timetable
2009-08-26
In July, 45 U.S. troops died in Afghanistan , the highest monthly toll this year. So far in August, 40 Americans have died, many in the south, and Pentagon officials say privately that with nearly a week left in the month, they expect August to exceed July's number. Americans make up the majority of the 63 coalition troops killed so far this month; 75 coalition soldiers died in July.

In 2008, total coalition deaths were 294, 155 of whom were Americans; the 2009 total through Tuesday was 295, of whom 172 were Americans.

There are currently 63,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan .

The four Americans who died Tuesday were killed when an explosion hit a convoy in Kandahar province. U.S. officials didn't disclose the identities of the soldiers or of their unit and did not say where the convoy was precisely when it was struck.

Senior U.S. military leaders have warned that troop deaths were likely to rise as the Obama administration sent an additional 17,500 troops and 4,000 trainers to Afghanistan . Those forces began arriving in Afghanistan earlier this summer, including thousands of Marines who launched a major offensive in southern Helmand province. Roughly 6,000 of those forces are still en route.

Under McChrystal, the U.S. is expanding its presence into parts of southern Afghanistan , including Kandahar and Helmand provinces, where coalition forces have never had enough troops to displace the Taliban .

Members of Congress are expressing concerns about U.S. progress in a country known as the graveyard of empires.

Sen. John McCain , R- Ariz. , a proponent of sending more troops to Afghanistan on Sunday called the trends in Afghanistan "very alarming and disturbing" on ABC News , while Sen. Russ Feingold , D- Wis. , a member on the Foreign Relations Committee , told his home state's Appleton Post-Crescent newspaper that he wants a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. forces.

"I think it is time we ought to start discussing a flexible timetable when people in America and Afghanistan and around the world can see where we intend and when we intend to bring our troops out," Feingold said, according to the paper.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#10  Feingold wants withdrawal timetable

Oh, about the time the replacement for the Twin Towers is up and open for business.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-08-26 18:27  

#9  The Dems in Congress are probably working towards the following scenario:
1) "Train" the Afghan army.
2) Declare them ready to fight on their own.
3) Withdraw the majority of US troops
4) Cut off all funding for support of Afghanistan
The result will be just like Viet Nam - and we'll end up with another picture like the one in the article. After all, steps 1 through 4 were what happened in Viet Nam.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2009-08-26 18:27  

#8  More troops + more restrictive ROE = more troop deaths

which was the plan to provide cover for surrendering this front of the war on muslim terrorists.
Posted by: Hellfish   2009-08-26 15:14  

#7  Is there anything left of the DLC?

Feingold has visions of being the next Ted Kennedy dancing in his eyes. The treasonous cur.

McCain's alright, Old Patriot. Anybody with a lick of sense would be alarmed with the current trends in Afghanistan, and he is ranking member on Armed Forces. It kind of *is* his business to express concern.

Talk of exit strategies is inherently rubbish, but I'd like some achievable victory conditions.

Afghanistan without a friendly seaward neighbor - either Pakistan, Iran, or some successor state carved from the territory of either of those two states - seems to be doomed to be Asia's bitch.

It isn't in Iran's national interests for Afghanistan to be a fetid psychotic shithole, speaking abstractly. That's just the current regime's inclination. On the other hand, Pakistan requires an Afghanistan either in shambles or in chains, so long as they're intent on waging cold war with India. It would seem logical, then, that the quickest way towards a stable Afghanistan & an end to the international force would be a sane & friendly regime in Iran.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2009-08-26 14:37  

#6  seems to me BHO is going to need liberal hawks and the DLC, which needs to become more active, again.
Posted by: liberal hawk   2009-08-26 13:54  

#5  NS - hes reading a bio of John Adams. That bodes well, IMO.
Posted by: liberal hawk   2009-08-26 13:53  

#4  Both McCain and Feingold should shut up. Neither has anything but their own personal political career in mind every time they open their pie hole. Both are disgusting creatures of Washington, and the sooner they either are voted out of office or retire, the better.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2009-08-26 13:45  

#3  In addition to a biography of Carter, Barry should be reading a bio on LBJ.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2009-08-26 13:28  

#2  ...again.
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2009-08-26 13:27  

#1  And so it begins...
Posted by: Bobby   2009-08-26 13:21  

00:00