You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
The Van Jones (non) feeding frenzy
2009-09-05
From a Nexis search a few moments ago:

Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the New York Times: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the Washington Post: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on NBC Nightly News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on ABC World News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on CBS Evening News: 0.

If you were to receive all your news from any one of these outlets, or even all of them together, and you heard about some sort of controversy involving President Obama's Special Adviser for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, your response would be, "Huh?" If you heard that that adviser, Van Jones, had apologized for a number of remarks and positions in the recent past, your response would be, "What?" And if you were in the Obama White House monitoring the Jones situation, you would be hoping that the news organizations listed above continue to hold the line -- otherwise, Jones, who is quite well thought of in Obama circles, would be history.

9/5/09 UPDATE: The New York Times, ABC and NBC hold the line

After the Jones controversy reached a boiling point on Friday, the Washington Post published a story, "White House Says Little on Embattled Jones," on page A-3 of its Saturday edition. But the New York Times remained silent on the story.

Likewise, on Friday night the "CBS Evening News" reported the Jones matter, but ABC's "World News" and "NBC Nightly News" again failed to report the story.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#4  Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the ...

Now go read the Exterminate the Parasites thread about the mainstream media dying.
Posted by: SteveS   2009-09-05 23:47  

#3  They're waiting for his removal....and then they'll file stories about the "racist haters" who destroyed this poor innocent man's career.
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-09-05 19:39  

#2  I certainly do NOT support his removal. He's quite an impressive spokesperson for the administration and one Republicans can ill afford to lose. If he must go however, let me suggest a lifetime appointment as US Ambassador to.....Rongelap Island in the Pacific.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-09-05 10:40  

#1  So when is the televised special broadcast: "A Salute to Our Dear Leader"?
Posted by: DMFD   2009-09-05 10:14  

00:00