You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
'Ethics' for sale
2009-09-07
Is Charlie Rangel worried that the House Ethics Committee -- notorious for handing out little more than a slap on the wrist for even the most egregious congressional misconduct -- might make an exception in his case?

Maybe that's why the embattled Harlem Democrat has been playing Santa Claus with his House colleagues, doling out more campaign cash from his own re-election kitty than almost any other member of Congress.

Among the 119 lucky recipients: three of the five Democrats on the House Ethics Committee.

The same people who are meant to be probing the growing list of his financial "oversights" and deciding what, if any, punishment to mete out.

(If they ever get around to finishing their investigation, that is -- the committee allegedly has been looking into Rangel's tangled fiscal affairs for the past 12 months.)

One member of the panel, Peter Welch of Vermont, wisely decided to return his $20,000 gift from Rangel, citing the need for "an abundance of caution."

But the other two -- Ben Chandler of Kentucky and G.K. Butterfield of North Carolina -- are holding on to Rangel's largesse, claiming it in no way interferes with their ability to sit in judgment on their benefactor.

So much for Speaker Nancy Pelosi's promise that this would be "the most ethical Congress ever."

Rangel, of course, faces probes on a whole host of issues, many of them first uncovered by The Post: illegally maintaining four rent-stabilized apartments; use of House stationery to solicit funds for a policy center; failure to pay property taxes; failure to report rental income, and acceptance of free Caribbean trips paid for by corporate lobbyists.

Then there's his most recent discloure filings -- which listed hundreds of thousands of dollars in previously unreported assets.

All of which makes Rangel's continued role as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee -- Congress' primary tax-writing body -- a mockery.

The Washington Post recognizes this -- the paper just called on Rangel to step down as chairman, saying he has "violated [the public] trust continually and seemingly without care."

You'd think Speaker Pelosi would realize what an embarrassment Rangel has become. But no -- she still stands by her man, insisting his chairmanship is secure.

No surprise -- with all that cash he's doling out to House Democrats, Rangel certainly knows how to win friends and influence people.

Posted by:Fred

#4  Nothing new here.

September 16, 2008
Categories: Campaigns

Black Caucus backs Rangel, quitting not "on the table"
It's not much of a surprise, but..

The Congressional Black Caucus offered embattled Charlie Rangel its "100 percent support" and a pair of standing ovations during a meeting this morning, according to several people in attendance.

The caucus's backing — which comes after Monday's inconclusive 90-minute meeting between Rangel and Nancy Pelosi — makes it much less likely the Harlem Democrat will be ousted by his own troops.

Unless, of course, there's a major new revelation akin to reports about apparent reporting lapses involving vacation properties in the Dominican Republic and Florida.

"Nancy won't challenge us on this, even if she wants to," said a member who attended the Rangel meeting.

Last night, Pelosi responded nonverbally when asked if she'd requested Rangel to step down as Ways and Means chairman, nodding "no" to reporters as she emerged from her meeting.

Rangel will also address the entire Democratic caucus during their weekly meeting — and is then scheduled to address New York State's Democratic delegation.

UPDATE: Rangel's attorney, Lanny Davis, just told reporters on a conference call that Rangel stepping down "is not even on the table. ... He will not be stepping down."
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-09-07 11:50  

#3  You'd think Speaker Pelosi would realize what an embarrassment Rangel has become... This assumes Pelosi and most of the rest of Congress can overlook their own short comings.
Posted by: WolfDog   2009-09-07 11:36  

#2  When Blair first came to power, he said his administration would be "whiter than white" when in fact they were institutionally corrupt from the start.

An interesting parallel I think? The U.S. is lucky as the Internet is now doing the job the MSM wouldn't do.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-09-07 10:18  

#1  Whatever you do rangel, don't resign.

I like having your punk ass up there as a living breathing testament to the culture of corruption that ass party is.
Posted by: newc   2009-09-07 06:47  

00:00