You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Military Airship Upgrade
2009-10-17
The U.S. military already uses a fleet of unmanned spy blimps to keep tabs on would-be enemies in Afghanistan and Iraq. Now, the Navy wants to upgrade the airships' sight and hearing, as part of its push for "wide area persistent surveillance."

The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division in Lakehurst New Jersey issued a call for research proposals this week, looking for all sorts of new sensors, sensor-processors, and communication relays to use on its new, snooping aerostats.

According to the Navy, the lighter-than-air-craft should also be able to see all across the spectrum -- from ultraviolet to visible light to infrared. The system should incorporate "advanced radar for target detection and tracking; laser radar for target tracking and identification; ESM [electronic support measures] for target location cueing and identification; C4I [Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence] for receiving and disseminating target information and secure transmission of imagery and target track data."

Ideas on other surveillance gear -- acoustic sensors, magnetic anomaly detectors, "biometrics technologies," and "non-cooperative ID sensors" -- are also welcome. Ditto the "insertion of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques into airborne sensors for situational optimization."
Though it sounds peculiar, why not mount an extremely long range sniper cannon? At the height of 5,000-15,000 feet, it could put a single round through the engine block of an advancing enemy vehicle.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#12  A friend pointed out the obvious: put a solid state laser on board. It could instantly toast anything in line of sight.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2009-10-17 20:02  

#11  And lose the diesels, F-100s are indicated.... with strakes... lottsa strakes - and the entire thing needs to be heavily armoured in case the reds arm their blimps. That's for Block 1. For Block II no more hot bunking.
Posted by: .5MT   2009-10-17 14:54  

#10  Weaponizing the blimps seems like a natural. I just fear the day they begin weaponizing traffic signals.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2009-10-17 13:01  

#9  Mad-Max showed the world that ANY vehicle could be better with a weapon welded on it.
Predator + AGM = Reaper
APC + 120mm Gun = Tank
Toyota + Machine Gun = Technical
biplane + sexygun = A-10
Blimp + Snipers rifle = OMGWTFBBQ
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-10-17 12:42  

#8  Guns would be silly. A simple 50 ft. long cubic zirconium needle ram would be sufficient for blimp-to-blimp combat. As in all things air-force trainning and reflexes would be everthing.

Stand by to ram!
K
6 hours later

We've nearly got heeeem!

Lunch

Hell this would be a natural for the AF.
Posted by: .5MT   2009-10-17 12:20  

#7  Let me recommend if I may, LOF-6 Daimler engines and four-bladed Heine wooden propellers? Only six would be needed to fly in a Star of David formation, which at the proper altitude could monitor hundreds or possibly thousdands of kilometers. :)
Posted by: Besoeker in Duitsland   2009-10-17 09:06  

#6  p.s. Welcome back Caliburn.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-10-17 07:22  

#5  Put a recoilless.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-10-17 07:21  

#4  Because it rocks.
Posted by: Excalibur   2009-10-17 07:06  

#3  "Why don't we put a gun on it?" has been heard so many times throughout history...

Because it works?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-10-17 07:03  

#2  Though it sounds peculiar, why not mount an extremely long range sniper cannon? At the height of 5,000-15,000 feet, it could put a single round through the engine block of an advancing enemy vehicle.

There's always somebody who wants to turn recce assets into light strike. "Why don't we put a gun on it?" has been heard so many times throughout history...
Posted by: gromky   2009-10-17 04:54  

#1  As per the proposed GLOBAL-SPACE PROMPT STRIKE concepts, the USDOD would need to also dev ADVANCED AIRSHIPS WID LANDING, LAUNCHING, + REFUELING CAPABILITIES FOR STRATEGIC ARMED UAV = UOVS oper from CONUS.

But, once again, I digress ...
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-10-17 02:12  

00:00