You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
EPA: Climate bill could add $100 year in costs
2009-10-25
A Senate plan to tackle global warming would add about $100 a year to the energy costs for a typical household, according to an analysis by the Environmental Protection Agency.
If you can't trust the word of the government who can you trust?
The analysis released late Friday by the office of Sen. Barbara Boxer, who heads the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, generally mirrors the cost projected by the EPA when it examined similar legislation that the House passed in the summer.

The Democratic bill calls for cutting greenhouse gases from power plants and large industrial facilities by shifting energy use away from fossil fuels, especially coal. It would cap emissions and allow trading of pollution allowances to mitigate the cost.

Boxer, D-Calif., has scheduled hearings this coming week on the bill. The committee will hear from Obama administration officials, including the EPA, on Tuesday.

President Barack Obama, in a speech Friday in Boston, said he believes "a consensus" is emerging in Congress on the climate issue. But he also accused some opponents of making "cynical claims that contradict the overwhelming scientific evidence" that the earth is becoming warmer in an attempt to derail legislation.

Posted by:Fred

#7  There was a popular bumper sticker in Texas during the 70's when I lived in Houston.
"Let them freeze in the dark"
Posted by: bman   2009-10-25 14:14  

#6  They also fail to calculate the cost from unemployment at the coal mines, the railroads transporting it to plants in the frigid midwest, and at the power plants themselves. If eliminating fossil fuels, what exactly are we going to use, if not nuclear power, which is also currently banned from expansion? Oh, I get it! The typical household will freeze to death, ending the problems of overpopulation, underemployment, and they will have no need of health care. Idiots.
Posted by: Lumpy Elmoluck5091   2009-10-25 13:22  

#5  These clowns give a whole new meaning to the words "lying sack of sh*t."
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-10-25 12:37  

#4  Maybe $100/yr in the bill we pay specifically to the gas company (and that includes those who are not on gas....). They obviously don't add on the additional cost for fuel, food, and everything else.

$100/week is indeed closer.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-10-25 11:09  

#3  Barbara Boxer (D-umbshit) is lying through her venomous teeth
Posted by: Frank G   2009-10-25 10:16  

#2  $100 per year? More like $100 per week.
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-10-25 10:16  

#1  A government scheme to completely restructure the energy economy of our country and it is only going to cost me less than 10 bucks a month? Here, hold my wallet while I think about it.
Posted by: SteveS   2009-10-25 10:11  

00:00